Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorPriede, JānisEN
dc.contributor.authorLatiša, Arta
dc.contributor.otherRiga Graduate School of LawEN
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-04T07:59:30Z
dc.date.available2023-09-04T07:59:30Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.lu.lv/dspace/handle/7/62052
dc.description.abstractThe growing concern of Big Tech influence in the EU and imposed regulation-GDPR has put a significant administrative burden on Big Tech companies and entrepreneurs within the EU as GDPR non-compliance fines have varied from one EU MS to another. Although GDPR attempted to solve previous e-Directives issues, it failed to seek harmonization among EU Member States, as the enforcement and implementation of the GDPR have been left to each MS DPA that has implemented GDPR in accordance with their national laws that have further led to fine unsynchronized systems and disproportionate penalties for non-compliance. The companies that do not obtain the resources to comply with GDPR receive high fines, leading to limited innovation, entrepreneurship, and consumer choice in society. GDPR lacks harmonization among EU Member States and it fails to strive balance between consumer and company interests.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherRiga Graduate School of Lawen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectResearch Subject Categories::LAW/JURISPRUDENCE::Other law::European lawen_US
dc.subjectGeneral Data Protection Regulationen_US
dc.subjectBig Techen_US
dc.subjectdigital businessesen_US
dc.titleEU regulations regarding digital businesses, such as GDPR, DMA, and DSA, impose a disproportionate administrative burden, compliance costs, and commercial risks on entrepreneurs operating in the EU on digital platformsen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesisen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record