Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorSoņeca, Viktorija
dc.contributor.authorBidnenko, Oksana
dc.contributor.otherRiga Graduate School of Law
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-20T06:11:51Z
dc.date.available2024-08-20T06:11:51Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.lu.lv/dspace/handle/7/66971
dc.description.abstractWhen dealing with refugee cases related to individuals involved in military conflicts, it is a challenge to identify the eligibility under the 1951 Convention, especially when the applicant is a member of the notorious mercenary group. This research is focused on the interaction between the interaction of exclusion clause and non-refoulement principle when an applicant is not eligible for refuge in the receiving state. Additionally, this research tends to find out the status of Wagner Group, the case study related to which is performed in the last chapter since mercenarism is not allowed in the Russian Federation.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherRiga Graduate School of Lawen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccessen_US
dc.subjectResearch Subject Categories::LAW/JURISPRUDENCE::Other law::International lawen_US
dc.subjectmercenarismen_US
dc.subjectinternational refugee lawen_US
dc.titleExclusion clause vs non-refoulement principle in relation to mercenaries: Wagner group caseen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesisen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record