Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorSoņeca, Viktorija
dc.contributor.authorStarovoitovs, Artjoms
dc.contributor.otherRiga Graduate School of Law
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-20T09:02:01Z
dc.date.available2024-08-20T09:02:01Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.lu.lv/dspace/handle/7/67013
dc.description.abstractOn July 15, 2024, the primacy principle of the EU Law will have been in place for exactly sixty years since its establishment in Costa v. E.N.E.L in 1964. Notwithstanding such a long time, EU Member States still experience challenges in its application, especially when their constitutional law is being affected. The thesis examines the clash between the application of the primacy principle and the protection of fundamental constitutional principles. The author has established the following research question: “How should the national courts apply the EU Law primacy principle to simultaneously safeguard the constitutional fundamental principles while still adhering to the primacy principle?” The analysis of jurisprudence of both the European Court of Justice and Constitutional Courts of EU Member States shows the need for careful balance between the interests of national states and the European Union as a whole.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherRiga Graduate School of Lawen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectResearch Subject Categories::LAW/JURISPRUDENCE::Public law::Constitutional lawen_US
dc.subjectResearch Subject Categories::LAW/JURISPRUDENCE::Other law::European lawen_US
dc.subjectConstitutional fundamental principlesen_US
dc.subjectCosta v. E.N.E.Len_US
dc.subjectPrimacy of EU lawen_US
dc.titleMethods of achieving the balance between the application of EU law primacy principle and protection of fundamental constitutional principlesen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesisen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record