| dc.contributor.advisor | Laizāne-Jurkāne, Marika | |
| dc.contributor.author | Bindule, Katrīna | |
| dc.contributor.other | Riga Graduate School of Law | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2020-11-03T06:58:44Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2020-11-03T06:58:44Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://dspace.lu.lv/dspace/handle/7/52844 | |
| dc.description.abstract | The main objective of this research is to compare the effectiveness of the World Trade Organization Dispute Settlement Body in context of two specific cases: DS462: Russian Federation - Recycling Fee on Motor Vehicles and DS463: Russian Federation - Recycling Fee on Motor Vehicles. These cases share common legal provisions of Russia, which are challenged by two different counter parties - the EU and Japan. However, despite highly similar context of the cases, their course of resolution differentiate. In this regard, main goal of this comparative analysis is to find a shortage in the WTO DSB, which could possibly be solved by the assistance of other regional organizations | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Riga Graduate School of Law | en_US |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess | en_US |
| dc.subject | Research Subject Categories::LAW/JURISPRUDENCE::Other law::International law | en_US |
| dc.subject | Dispute settlement | en_US |
| dc.subject | World Trade Organization | en_US |
| dc.title | Beneficial contribution of regional assistance in the effectiveness of dispute settlement within the World Trade Organization: comparison of trade dispute settlement between Russia v. EU and Russia v. Japan | en_US |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis | en_US |
