Digitālās refrakcijas pielietojums labākā koriģētā redzes asuma novērtēšanai
Loading...
Date
Authors
Advisor
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Latvijas Universitāte
Language
lav
Abstract
Darbs ir uzrakstīts angļu valodā uz 36 lappusēm, satur 20 attēlus, 4 tabulas un 35 literatūras avotus. Darba mērķis ir pārbaudīt redzes asumu ar trim refrakcijas metodēm: autorefraktometriju, subjektīvo refraktometriju un digitālo refraktometriju ar ierīci ESSILOR Vision R-800. Tika salīdzināta refrakcija 15 subjektiem vecumā no 12 līdz 40 gadiem. Refrakcijas dati tika pārveidoti optiskā stipruma vektora formā. Rezultāti: Statistiski nozīmīgas atšķirības tika konstatētas redzes asumam, bet ne optiskā stipruma vektoriem, kas bija ļoti līdzīgi viens otram. Secinājums: digitālā refrakcija ar precizitāti 0,01 D pie nepārtrauktas optiskā stipruma maiņas parādīja labāku redzes asumu pat pie zema attēla kontrasta.
Thesis is written in English on 36 pages. It contains 20 figures, tables 4 and 35 references. The aim of thesis is to evaluate the vision acuity with three refraction methods: Autorefractometry, Subjective Refraction and Digital Refraction with ESSILOR Digital Phoropter Vision R-800. Refraction was compared for 15 subjects aged 12 to 40 years. The refractions were converted into Power Vector form. Results: Statistically significant differences were found between visual acuity, but not for optical power vectors, which were very similar to each other. Conclusion: Digital refraction with an accuracy of 0.01 D and continuous optical power change showed better visual acuity even at low contrast.
Thesis is written in English on 36 pages. It contains 20 figures, tables 4 and 35 references. The aim of thesis is to evaluate the vision acuity with three refraction methods: Autorefractometry, Subjective Refraction and Digital Refraction with ESSILOR Digital Phoropter Vision R-800. Refraction was compared for 15 subjects aged 12 to 40 years. The refractions were converted into Power Vector form. Results: Statistically significant differences were found between visual acuity, but not for optical power vectors, which were very similar to each other. Conclusion: Digital refraction with an accuracy of 0.01 D and continuous optical power change showed better visual acuity even at low contrast.