Iekšgrupu identifikācijas un kolektīvās efektivitātes saistība ar videi draudzīgu rīcību
Loading...
Date
Authors
Advisor
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Latvijas Universitāte
Language
lav
Abstract
Pētījums, kas balstās sociālās identitātes pieejā, tika vērsts uz saistību pētīšanu starp iekšgrupas identifikāciju (divos līmeņos – ar Latvijas iedzīvotājiem un globālajā līmenī), kolektīvo efektivitāti un videi draudzīgu rīcību. Pētījumā piedalījās 97 respondenti. Tika izmantota Identifikācijas ar cilvēkiem visā pasaulē skala (Identification With All Humanity Scale, IWAH), apgalvojumi, kas mēra kolektīvo efektivitāti, un CO₂ emisiju tiešsaistes kalkulators. Identifikācija ar Latvijas iedzīvotājiem bija vāji pozitīvi saistīta ar ticību kolektīvajai efektivitātei (izņemot apakšskalu "Saikne"), globālā identifikācija demonstrēja mēreni pozitīvu saistību. Iekšgrupas identifikācija un kolektīvā efektivitāte nebija statistiski nozīmīgi saistītas ar CO₂ emisiju līmeni. Rezultāti atklāja, ka pie globālās identifikācijas dalībnieki augstāk vērtēja kolektīvo efektivitāti, iekšgrupas normu uztveri, globālās sasilšanas problēmas nopietnību un tās negatīvo ietekmi uz cilvēkiem. Turklāt globālā identifikācija (kopējā skalā) bija ciešāk pozitīvi saistīta ar šiem rādītājiem nekā identifikācija ar Latvijas iedzīvotājiem.
This study, grounded in the social identity approach, aimed to examine the relationships among ingroup identification (with Latvian residents and globally), collective efficacy, and pro-environmental behavior, measured through CO₂ emissions. There were 97 participants in the sample. Instruments included the Identification With All Humanity Scale (IWAH), items measuring collective efficacy, and an online CO₂ emissions calculator. Identification with Latvian residents was weakly positively associated with collective efficacy (except for the “Bond” subscale), while global identification showed a moderate positive relationship. However, neither ingroup identification nor collective efficacy was significantly associated with CO₂ emissions. The results revealed that, in the context of global identification, participants reported higher levels of perceived collective efficacy, ingroup norm perception, awareness of the seriousness of global warming and its negative impact on people. Moreover, global identification (by the overall scale) showed stronger positive associations with these variables compared to identification with Latvian residents.
This study, grounded in the social identity approach, aimed to examine the relationships among ingroup identification (with Latvian residents and globally), collective efficacy, and pro-environmental behavior, measured through CO₂ emissions. There were 97 participants in the sample. Instruments included the Identification With All Humanity Scale (IWAH), items measuring collective efficacy, and an online CO₂ emissions calculator. Identification with Latvian residents was weakly positively associated with collective efficacy (except for the “Bond” subscale), while global identification showed a moderate positive relationship. However, neither ingroup identification nor collective efficacy was significantly associated with CO₂ emissions. The results revealed that, in the context of global identification, participants reported higher levels of perceived collective efficacy, ingroup norm perception, awareness of the seriousness of global warming and its negative impact on people. Moreover, global identification (by the overall scale) showed stronger positive associations with these variables compared to identification with Latvian residents.