Patiesības kā juridiska koncepta izpausme civilprocesā
Loading...
Date
Authors
Advisor
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Latvijas Universitāte
Language
lav
Abstract
Patiesība ir kategorija tiesību zinātnē, filozofijā un loģikā. Patiesības noskaidrošana ir priekšnosacījums taisnīgumam, tādēļ tiesas procesā tiesas pienākums ir vispusīgi, objektīvi, ievērojot precizitāti un konkrētību, sasniegt pēc iespējas pilnīgāku objektīvo patiesību lietā. Patiesība izpaužas pierādīšanas procesā, izziņas procesā un tiesas argumentācijā. Maģistra darbā ir pētīts patiesības jēdziens un teorijas, tās kritēriji un veidi, patiesības noskaidrošanas principa mijiedarbība ar taisnīguma un sacīkstes principu, raksturots patiesības normatīvais regulējums, analizēta patiesības noskaidrošanas nozīme tiesas nolēmumā un objektīvās patiesības noskaidrošanu ierobežojošie apstākļi. Maģistra darba mērķis ir izanalizēt patiesības noskaidrošanas procesuāltiesisko regulējumu, padziļināti pētot patiesības kā juridiska koncepta izpausmi civilprocesā saistībā ar taisnīguma un sacīkstes principu. Maģistra darbā ir secināts, ka tiesas pienākums ir noskaidrot objektīvo patiesību, ciktāl tas ir iespējams, un to ir iespējams sasniegt gan civilprocesā, gan kriminālprocesā, gan administratīvajā procesā. Objektīvā patiesība nozīmē vispusīgu, pilnīgu un objektīvu lietas apstākļu izpēti.
Truth is a category in law, philosophy and logic. Truth-seeking is a prerequisite for justice; hence, the court’s duty in the trial is to achieve the most complete objective truth in the case by acting comprehensively, objectively, and respecting accuracy and specificity. The truth manifests itself in the process of proof, the process of inquiry and the reasoning of the court. The Master’s thesis studies the concept and theories of truth, its criteria and types, the interaction between the principle of truth-seeking and the principle of justice and adversary, characterises the legal and regulatory framework of truth, and analyses the significance of truth-seeking in the court decision and the conditions limiting objective truth-seeking. The aim of the Master’s thesis is to analyse the procedural regulation of truth-seeking through an in-depth study of the expression of truth as a legal concept in civil procedure in relation to the principles of justice and adversary proceeding. The Master’s thesis concludes that the duty of the court is to find the objective truth, as far as possible, and it may be achieved in the civil procedure, the criminal procedure and the administrative procedure. Objective truth is a comprehensive, complete and objective investigation of the circumstances of the case.
Truth is a category in law, philosophy and logic. Truth-seeking is a prerequisite for justice; hence, the court’s duty in the trial is to achieve the most complete objective truth in the case by acting comprehensively, objectively, and respecting accuracy and specificity. The truth manifests itself in the process of proof, the process of inquiry and the reasoning of the court. The Master’s thesis studies the concept and theories of truth, its criteria and types, the interaction between the principle of truth-seeking and the principle of justice and adversary, characterises the legal and regulatory framework of truth, and analyses the significance of truth-seeking in the court decision and the conditions limiting objective truth-seeking. The aim of the Master’s thesis is to analyse the procedural regulation of truth-seeking through an in-depth study of the expression of truth as a legal concept in civil procedure in relation to the principles of justice and adversary proceeding. The Master’s thesis concludes that the duty of the court is to find the objective truth, as far as possible, and it may be achieved in the civil procedure, the criminal procedure and the administrative procedure. Objective truth is a comprehensive, complete and objective investigation of the circumstances of the case.