Acs-rokas dominances ietekme uz reakcijas laiku
Loading...
Date
Authors
Advisor
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Latvijas Universitāte
Language
lav
Abstract
Darbs ir uzrakstīts latviešu valodā uz 27 lapaspusēm, satur 15 attēlus, 1 tabulu, 55 atsauces uz literatūras avotiem un 3 pielikumus. Pētījuma mērķis: izpētīt, kā dominējošā acs un dominējošā roka ietekmē reakcijas laiku, reaģējot uz vizuāliem stimuliem. Metode: tika noteikta motorā dominantā acs un dominantā roka, kā arī mērīts reakcijas laiks, izmantojot Sanet Vision Integrator iekārtu. Rezultāti: pārstāvjiem ar kreisās rokas dominanci bija ievērojami ātrāks reakcijas laiks nekā labās rokas dominances pārstāvjiem, savukārt, salīdzinot savā starpā acs-rokas dominances grupas, kā arī vienas puses un krustotās dominances grupas, rezultāti neuzrādīja nozīmīgas atšķirības reakcijas laikā.
The thesis is written in Latvian on 27 pages, contains 15 images, 1 table, 55 references to literature sources and 3 appendices. The aim of the thesis: determine how the dominant eye and dominant hand affect reaction time in response to visual stimuli. Method: the motor dominant eye and dominant hand were determined, as well as the reaction time was measured using the Sanet Vision Integrator device. Results: representatives of left-hand dominance had significantly faster reaction time compared to right-hand dominance representatives, comparing the eye-hand dominance groups, as well as the same side and cross-dominance groups, the results showed no significant differences in reaction times.
The thesis is written in Latvian on 27 pages, contains 15 images, 1 table, 55 references to literature sources and 3 appendices. The aim of the thesis: determine how the dominant eye and dominant hand affect reaction time in response to visual stimuli. Method: the motor dominant eye and dominant hand were determined, as well as the reaction time was measured using the Sanet Vision Integrator device. Results: representatives of left-hand dominance had significantly faster reaction time compared to right-hand dominance representatives, comparing the eye-hand dominance groups, as well as the same side and cross-dominance groups, the results showed no significant differences in reaction times.