Depresijas, ruminēšanas un sociālo problēmu risināšanas saistība
Loading...
Date
Authors
Advisor
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Latvijas Universitāte
Language
N/A
Abstract
Mērķis bija noskaidrot, kāda ir saistība starp depresijas izteiktības pakāpi, ruminatīvas reaģēšanas veidiem un problēmu risināšanas dimensijām. Pētījumā piedalījās 137 studenti (19–36 g.; M = 22,9), tostarp 105 sievietes un 32 vīrieši. Tika izmantota Beka Depresijas aptauja (Beck Depression Inventory II. Beck, Steer & Brown, 1996), Ruminatīvas reaģēšanas aptauja (Ruminative Responses Scale; Treynor, Gonzalez & Susan Nolen-Hoeksema, 2003) un Problēmu risināšanas aptauja (Problem Solving Inventory. Heppner & Petersen, 1982). Rezultāti norāda, ka depresijas izteiktības pakāpe pozitīvi korelē ar visiem trim ruminatīvās reaģēšanas veidiem, bet negatīvi – ar pārliecinātu problēmu risināšanu un paškontroli. Negatīva saistība ir izvairīgai problēmu risināšanai ar depresīvo domāšanu; pārliecinātai problēmu risināšanai ar ruminatīvo refleksiju un depresīvo domāšanu, kā arī paškontrolei ar visiem trim ruminatīvās reaģēšanas veidiem. Depresīvā domāšana izskaidro 34% no kopējās depresijas variācijas.
The aim of the study was to establish correlation between severity of depression, ruminative response styles and problem solving dimensions. A total number of 137 students (105 women and 32 men) aged between 19 and 36 (M = 22.9) were enrolled in the study. Beck Depression Inventory (BDI II. Beck, Steer & Brown, 1996), Ruminative Responses Scale (Treynor, Gonzalez & Susan Nolen-Hoeksema, 2003) and Problem Solving Inventory (Heppner & Petersen, 1982) were used. The results indicate that severity of depression has a statistically significant positive correlation with all 3 types of ruminative responses, whereas negative with confident problem solving and personal control. Approach avoidance style negatively correlates with depressive thinking; as well as confident problem solving with ruminative reflection and depressive thinking, and personal control with all 3 types of ruminative responses. Depressive thinking clarifies 34% out of the total depression variation.
The aim of the study was to establish correlation between severity of depression, ruminative response styles and problem solving dimensions. A total number of 137 students (105 women and 32 men) aged between 19 and 36 (M = 22.9) were enrolled in the study. Beck Depression Inventory (BDI II. Beck, Steer & Brown, 1996), Ruminative Responses Scale (Treynor, Gonzalez & Susan Nolen-Hoeksema, 2003) and Problem Solving Inventory (Heppner & Petersen, 1982) were used. The results indicate that severity of depression has a statistically significant positive correlation with all 3 types of ruminative responses, whereas negative with confident problem solving and personal control. Approach avoidance style negatively correlates with depressive thinking; as well as confident problem solving with ruminative reflection and depressive thinking, and personal control with all 3 types of ruminative responses. Depressive thinking clarifies 34% out of the total depression variation.