THESEdeDOCTORATenCOTUTELLE
de I'UNIVERSITE PARIS VII et de L'INSTITUT de PHYSIQUE
de I'ACADEMIE des SCIENCES de LETTONIE
speciaiite: Physique des Liquides
presentee par
Sandris LAcISI.-
pour obtenir le grade DOCTEUR de l'UNIVERSITE PARIS VII et de L'INSTITUT de
PHYSIQUE de l'ACADEMIE des SCIENCES de LETTONIE
COMPORTEMENT D'UNE GOUTTE DE LIQUIDE MAGNETIQUE
DA.~SUN CHAMP MAGNETIQUE VARIABLE:
THEORIE ET SIMULATION
MAGNETISKA SKIDRUMA PILIENA DINAMlKA MAINIGOS,
MAGNETISKOS LAUKOS:
TEORIJA UN SKAITLISKA MODELESANA
BEHAVIOUR OF A MAGNETIC FLUID DROP
IN A TIME DEPENDENT MAGNETIC FIELD:
THEORY AND SIMULATION
English version
soutenue Ie 15 fevrier 1996 devant Ie jury compose de :
G. BOSSIS
A GAILITIS
J.-C. BACRI
A CEBERS
R GOLDSTEIN
Rapporteur
Rapporteur
S38. 95S -itCJ't (043)
6~ 1."3 a.(- "oil (IJ 1t!J
To my grandmother Marta Plikause
Acknowledgements
I am very much obliged to prof. Jaques Duran and prof. Alain Mauger for the
warm hospitality and the stimulating conditions for scientific work in Laboratoir
d'Acoustique et Optique de fa Matiere Condensee, University Paris 6. I am very
grateful to prof. Olgerts Lielausis for his support to my scientific work in Institute of
Physics, Latvia.
I am very much obliged to both my thesis-directors, prof. Jean-Claude Bacri
and prof. Andrejs Cebers. I have had an opportunity to profit from the doubled
experience of two directors as well as 1 have used non-ordinary chance to look on
physical phenomena from two viewpoints, joining together the theoretical and
experimental knowledge
The thesis will never be possible without the assistance of prof. Regine
Perzynski during both helpful discussions and everyday situations.
I would like to express my deepest gratitude to prof. George Bossis and prof. Agris
Gailitis, who have agreed to be "rapporteurs" of my thesis and thus have made the
enormous work in rather limited time
I am also very thankful to prof Raymond Goldstein who have found possible
to take care of my work being a member of the thesis jury
I feel it my pleasant duty to express my thankfulness to all the people of
AOMC. laboratory, who have stimulated my research I would like especially to
mention Urnberto dOrtona for his help during my first steps in UNIX enviroment.
The French version of the theses will never see the day-light without the
excellent work of Jean-Christophe Dabadie translating it from English.
And last but not least, I would like to thank my Latvian colleges, who have helped me
to keep connection to Latvia and to manage formalities in Latvia during my absence,
especially I wish to thank assocprof. Leonids Buligins and Ivars Drikis.
Contents
Introduction 9
Chapter 1
Physical properties and models of magnetic liquids 13
1.1. Magnetic fluids and their properties 13
1.1.1. General properties 13
1.1.2. Concentrated phase 18
1.2. Ferrohydrodynamical surface instabilities 20
1.2.1. Free ferro fluid droplet in a static field 20
1.2.2. Sessile ferrofluid droplet in a static field 21
1.2.3. Free ferrofluid surface instability in vertical field 21
1.2.4. Instabilities of ferrofluid in a narrow gap between two parallel plates 22
1.2.5. Instabilities of ferro fluid droplet in rotating field 23
1.3. Choice of the characteristical units 24
1.4. Boundary integral equations 25
1.4.1. Stokes flow 25
1.4.2. Boundary conditions for a velocity field 26
1.4.3. Boundary integral formulation for a creeping flow 27
1.4.4. Partial differential equations for a magnetic field 32
1.4.5. Boundary conditions for a magnetic field 33
5
1.4.6. Derivation of boundary integral equations 33
Direct formulation of boundary integral equations 33
Indirect formulation of boundary integral equations 35
Cone! usions 38
CHAPTER 2
Approximation of boundary integral equations 39
2.1. Interpolation of a planar boundary 39
2.2. General remarks about discretization of boundary integral equations 41
2.3. Equations for a magnetic field 43
Separation of the external field components .45
The shape periodicity of the droplet 45
The accuracy of the magnetic field calculations 46
2.4. Equations for the motion of a free boundary 48
The accuracy of the boundary velocity calculations 50
CHAPTER 3
High-frequency rotating magnetic field: the energy approach 57
3.1. Shape generation for energy calculations 57
Included paper. 63
Conclusions 85
6
CHAPTER 4
High-frequency rotating magnetic field: dynamic simulation 87
4.1. Theoretical predictions '" 88
4.2. n-lobe perturbation decrements in the case of creeping flow 90
4.3. Dynamical simulation of the 2D droplet in the high-frequency
rotating magnetic field 97
Included paper. 117
Conclusions 127
CHAPTERS
Magnetic fluid droplet in low-frequency rotating magnetic fields .. 129
Included papers 141
Conclusions 155
Chapter 6
Droplet in low-frequency elliptically polarised field: mode
locking and Devil' s staircase '" 157
Included paper 167
Conclusions 195
General Conclusions 197
References 203
Table of figures 213
7
Introduction
The behaviour of a ferrofluid droplet in a rotating field is quite intricate
including even transition to chaotic dynamics. If at present the behaviour of droplet in
static field is quite well understood both theoretically and experimentally then in
rotating field or even more in the field of more complicate character there are great
variety of rather complex phenomena for which at present moment adequate
theoretical understanding does not still exists. Existing theoretical approaches are
based on simple assumptions of ellipsoidal shapes of droplets as in 3D and 2D. More
complex shapes is possible to study enough thoroughly only by numerical means.
The goal of the present thesis work was to perform analytical and numerical
studies of a 2D ferrofluid droplet in a rotating magnetic field including elaboration of
the corresponding numerical tools. For that small perturbation theory is used in the
case of simple geometry to find the growth rate of perturbations and boundary element
method is used to solve the moving free boundary problem of droplet behaviour. In
the last case the satellite problem of the creeping flow and the magnetic field have to
be solved in the every time step.
In the first chapter the short overview about most important properties of
magnetic fluids and especially about the concentrated phase of a magnetic fluid is
given. The concentrated phase due to its abnormally high magnetic susceptibility and
low surface tension on the interface between two phases, leading to high values of a
magnetic Bond number, enables to observe many intrinsic phenomena, which are not
to observe in experiments with conventional ferrofluids. In the rest of this chapter the
low Reynolds number flow (called creeping flow) problem and the satellite problem
of a magnetic field solution are defined for a 2D droplet using boundary integral
equation formulation.
The second chapter contains approximation of boundary integral equations,
given in the first chapter. The boundary element method (BEM) accuracy is tested
using exact analytical solutions. The results of test display that BEM accuracy allows
9
Introduction
to use it to simulate numerically unsteady motion of a 2D droplet in an external
magnetic field. On the basis of given discrete algorithms the various computer codes
are elaborated to perform BEM simulation in the case of the magnetic field problem at
given geometry (chapter 3) and in the cases of coupled magnetic field and creeping
flow problems (chapters 4 and 5).
In the case of a high-frequency rotating magnetic field time averaging of surface
forces could be used if the rotation period is much smaller than characteristic
relaxation time for a droplet. In the third chapter the equilibrium figures of a 2D
droplet are studied from minimal energy viewpoint in high-frequency field. The
favourite shape with a minimal energy is found from an a priori given set of shapes at
a given magnetic field strength amplitude, using time-averaging for a magnetic
energy. Such an approach allows to detect the magnetic field threshold at which the
perturbation from the circular shape of a droplet appears, if a magnetic field strength
is increased from the zero value. The decrease of a magnetic field strength displays
the hysteresis effect, if magnetic permeability of the ferro fluid is high enough. The
magnetic field is calculated by BEM, families of shapes are generated by the special
technique described in this chapter.
The constraints of the droplet shape in the third chapter interfere in the obtaining
transitions between shapes with different numbers of spikes. In the fourth chapter the
solution of the whole free moving boundary problem of a 2D ferro fluid droplet by
BEM in the case of time-averaged surface forces provides information about the
evolution of shapes. It has been illustrated by direct numerical simulation that starting
from random initial state transitions to configurations with two and three spikes are
observed. The four spike shape appears to be unstable in 2D.
The fifth chapter contains results of a 2D droplet simulation in a low-frequency
rotating magnetic field. It has been shown that two different scenarios for a behaviour
of a droplet exist in dependence on the value of the magnetic Bond number. In the
case of large magnetic Bond number values there is the critical frequency for a
magnetic field rotation up to which droplet is able to follow the field rotation. Beyond
this critical frequency droplet is no more phase locked to the magnetic field and
exhibits rather intrinsic behaviour, peculiarities of which is analysed in more detail in
10
Introduction
the case of the more general elliptic field polarisation in the next, namely sixth
chapter. In the fifth chapter under the assumption of an elliptic shape of a droplet two
sets of the equations of motion are derived and used to obtain the characteristics of a
droplet behaviour in the fifth chapter. The comparison with the BEM shows fairly
well agreement. The BEM simulations display that the role of the bending instability
of a droplet increases, if the viscosity of a droplet is increased with respect to the one
of a surrounding fluid.
The last, namely sixth chapter is devoted the behaviour of a droplet in an
elliptical polarised rotating magnetic field. Elliptical polarisation of a field is the
source of the second modulation frequency, interaction of which with the frequency of
the droplet's rotation causes such effects as the mode-locking represented by the
devil's staircase, overlapping of mode-locking intervals, period doubling and the
transition to a chaos.
Throughout the present work the cgs system, and particularly the
electromagnetic cgs system of units, centred on gauss unit for a magnetic field is
used.
11
Chapter 1
Physical properties and models of
magnetic liquids
1.1. Magnetic fluids and their properties
1.1.1. General properties
The studies of magnetic fluids started in the early 1960s. Most of applications of
colloidal magnetic fluids (ferro fluids) were recognised slightly latter, when real
ferro fluids become available, because they are pure artificial product: they are not
found in nature. The name "ferrofluids" was proposed by R.E.Rosensweig [77], the
name magnetic fluids was used in [99] by M.I.Shliomis. Perhaps the name
"ferrohydrodynamics" (FHD) matches the topic of hydrodynamics of magnetic fluids
at best, since the name "magnetohydrodynamics" (MHD) is mostly used for
phenomena where the interaction between magnetic fields and electric currents in
fluids takes place. Nevertheless, it should be noted that the term MHD is still used as
more general, covering both topics, "classical" MHD and ferrohydrodynamics.
Exhausting overviews about magnetic fluids and their most important physical and
chemical properties are given in [22,25,91].
Ferrohydrodynamics studies the flow of magnetic fluid under the action of
strong forces of magnetic polarisation. The main difference between MHD and FHD
is that in MHD the body force acting on the fluid is the Lorentz force that arise when
electric current flows at an angle to the direction of a magnetic field. In FHD usually
there is no electric current flowing in the fluid. The body force in FHD is due to
13
Chapter 1
polarisation force, which in turn requires material magnetisation in the presence of
magnetic field gradients or discontinuities.
The uniqueness of ferrofluids is in giant magnetic response to magnetic field. As
a result many surprising phenomena are exhibited by the magnetic fluids in response
to magnetic fields:
• normal field instability (formation of a pattern of spikes on the fluid surface);
• the labyrinthine pattern formation in thin layers;
• the generation of body couple in rotary fields, which IS manifested as
antisymmetric stress;
• self levitation of an immersed magnet;
• enhanced convective cooling in ferrofluids having a temperature-dependent
magnetic moment;
• and many others.
During the last thirty years since ferrofluids become available, great variety of
applications of them in different branches are found. Actual commercial usage
presently includes [25,87,91]:
• novel zero leakage rotary shaft seals, used in computer disk drives [15];
• vacuum feedthroughs for semiconductor manufacturing [76];
• pressure seals for compressors and blowers [90];
• liquid-cooled loudspeakers that employ a ferro fluid to conduct heat away from the
speakers coils [23,56];
• piloting the path of a drop of ferrofluid in the body, to bring drugs to a target site
[75];
• non-invasive circulatory measurements of the blood flow [78,84];
• artificial high specific gravity effect applied to separate mixtures of industrial scrap
metals such as titanium, aluminium, and zinc [47,98];
• high-speed, inexpensive, silent printers. using magnetic fluid ink [72];
14
Chapter 1
Here just more known applications are mentioned, in fact this list IS still under
growing.
Exist several types of magnetic fluids, but the principal type of them is
"colloidal ferrofluid". A colloid is a suspension of finely divided particles in a
continuous medium, including suspensions that settle out slowly. However, a true
ferrofluid have not to settle out, even long exposure of a force field causes a slight
concentration gradient. A good ferro fluid [95] have to be a concentrated, stable
suspension of very small magnetic particles in a liquid. A surfactant normally
provides the colloid stability. Therefore the traditional ferrofluids are composed of
small (3-15 run), solid, single-domain magnetic particles coated with a molecular
layer of a dispersant and suspended in a liquid carrier. The difference of the ionic-
ferrofluids [73] from the surfactant-stabilised ones is that they are stabilised due to the
strongly screened electrostatic repulsion of ionic particles. Brownian motion keeps
particles suspended, and the coatings prevent the particles from sticking to each other.
Vander Waals attraction is one of the main problems to obtain colloidal particles that
are stable with respect to mutual agglomeration. To prevent particles from
approaching so close to one another that van der Waals attraction prevail, the steric
repulsion mechanism is used. For that particle surface is coated by long chain
molecules in such a way that the polar "heads" of chains are adsorbed by the particle
but the "tail" creates "elastic bumper" layer. According to the simplest model of a
stable magnetic fluid [22], a particle inside it is characterised by three dimensions,
namely, magnetic core diameter dm, solid diameter d., and coating diameter d.,
Quantities d, and d., are not the same because due to chemical interactions between
stabiliser and the particles, the surface layer of the particles may lose magnetic
properties.
A low evaporation rate, a low viscosity and chemical inertness are desirable
properties fore the base liquid. A ferrofluid remains flowable in the presence of
magnetic field even when magnetised to saturation. Nonetheless, the reology is
affected by the presence of a field [25,100].
The stability of the magnetic liquid IS ensured by the balance between the
various interparticle interactions:
15
Chapter 1
• magnetic dipole-dipole interaction,
• van der Waals interaction,
• dipole-magnetic field interaction,
• and
• either steric repulsion via the solvent particles coated with a surfactant in the
case of surfactant-stabilised ferrofluids when particles are coated with surfactant
chains,
• or strongly screened electrostatic repulsion for ionic particles in the case of ionic
colloids when magnetic particles are made also macro-ions in order to create
electrostatic repulsion.
Stability in a magnetic field gradient is the stability against settling of particles
in a field gradient due to an external magnetic source. Thermal motion of particles
should prevent the attraction of them to the higher intensity regions of a magnetic
source. Stability against segregation is favoured by a high ratio of the thermal energy
to the magnetic energy: ksT / A1HV::::: 1, here kB: Boltzmann constant, T: temperature,
M: magnetisation, H: magnetic field strength, V: volume of the particle. This relation
forms an upper limit for particle size. The related topic is the stability against
magnetic agglomeration. Due to collisions between particles, they could agglomerate
rapidly if particles adhere together. Here again the thermal energy is responsible to
separate the particles, i.e. to overcome dipole-dipole interaction, characterised by ratio
of thermal and dipole-dipole contact energy. The requirement for stability in a
gravitational field is usually lower than the requirements for stability in magnetic
field.
There are two magnetic relaxation mechanisms in ferrofluids: relaxation by
rotation if particle in the liquid and the relaxation due to rotation of the magnetic
vector within the particle. Solidified ferro fluid has only the second mechanism. The
particle rotation mechanism is characterised by a Brownian rotation diffusion time 1'B
having hydrodynamical origin [25,50,91] and given by 1's = 3Vllo / kT where V is the
particle volume and 110 the viscosity of the carrier liquid. The second relaxation has
so-called Neel relaxation time [25,50,91]
16
Chapter 1
r = _1 exp( KV)
B fo kT
where KV is the height of energy barrier which separates the two possible
magnetisation orientations inside the particle in absence of field for single-domain
uniaxial ferromagnetic particle.
The two main magnetic fluid preparation kinds are sketched below.
Preparation by size reduction.
Size reduction by grinding can succeed in reducing bulk (micron-size) material
to the order of lOoA in size. The method discovered by S.Papell [81], further
developed by many researchers (see [91D. Preparation of ferrofluid consists from
following steps 91:
• urn size magnetic powder is mixed with solvent and surfactant dispersing agent;
• size reduction in ball grind;
• centrifugation to separate oversize solids;
• correction of particle concentration.
Typical preparation time is about 1000h.
Preparation of ferrofluids by chemical precipitation
There are many chemical methods to prepare ferrofluids. Here just three more
representative of them are mentioned according to [91]:
• magnetite precipitation with steric stabilisation;
• cobalt particles in an organic carrier;
• charge-stabilised magnetite.
The chemical methods are fast typical preparation time are few hours, they can
be cheap, but they are restricted to a few particular compounds. Special fluids are
produced mainly by size reduction. Additional stabilisation effect is achieved by steric
repulsion mechanism due to the presence of long chain molecules absorbed onto the
particle surface.
17
Chapter 1
1.1.2. Concentrated phase
In the general purpose of technical applications require industrial products stable
in time, proof against temperature variations and magnetic field action. Nevertheless
in some particular cases it is possible to take advantage of the phase separation in
magnetic liquids. The concentrated phase could be obtained due to failure of stability
leading to a phase separation in two liquids of different particle concentrations:
droplets of concentrated phase grow among the more dilute phase [31]. A phase
separation could be induced by many factors, for example; temperature lowering, for
sterically stabilised particles, some variations of free surfactant concentration; for
electrostatically stabilised particles, an increase of ionic strength.
The concentrated phase causes interest due to its outstanding physical
properties: it was found in [11] that susceptibility XSI=J.l-l~40 (magnetic permeability
fl~40) and surface tension cr~5·10-7J·m-2=5_IQ-4erg-ern" for an ionic ferrofluid and in
[86] for a surfactant stabilised ferrofluid XSI=fl-I-80 (fl~80) and cr~3_10-7J.m-2=3-1O-
4 -2erg-cm .
These susceptibilities are about an order of magnitude higher than for usual
magnetic fluids, what allows to observe some phenomena which appears only in the
case of high susceptibility. Such extraordinary values of susceptibility are possible
due to a high packing of particles in a concentrated phase, additional effect caused by
a packing is large values of viscosity. In contrary, surface tension at the boundary of
the two phases is very low. Magnetisation curve for concentrated phase exhibits [31]:
• a linear regime with very high initial susceptibility in low field, what means that
the particles keep their rotational degrees of freedom,
• a very large saturation value (~ 90 kAlm=1130 Oe), what means a volume fraction
of magnetic particles close to the maximum reasonable value (-24%) for a
ferro suspension retaining its fluidity [94].
Hence in order to obtain concentrated phase, repulsive interaction should be
decreased. For ionic ferrofluids it is much simpler to realise since they are directly
synthesised as micro-ions [73], but for by surfactant stabilised magnetic liquids it is
very complicate to decrease repulsion.
18
Chapter 1
In the concentrated phase, distance between particles are determined only by the
solvate shells. The concentration of the concentrated phase is always the same and
about equal to 25 % in volume. Every particle is surrounded by a shell of structural
water of thickness 1 or 2 run, so all the water shells mix into a single one in the whole
phase. A liquid-gas like phase separation always causes that a concentrated phase
appears as droplets inside a more diluted phase.
19
Chapter I
1.2. Ferrohydrodynamical surface instabilities
1.2.1. Free ferrofluid droplet in a static field
A deformation of a ferrofluid droplet in a static field is studied experimentally in
[2,46] and theoretically under assumption of an ellipsoidal shape of a droplet [24,32]
in zero gravity. Very interesting results are obtained in experiments with a
concentrated phase [11,12,14]. In [11,14] under assumption of the prolate ellipsoidal
shape of the ferrofluid droplet the equilibrium shapes are described from the balance
between magnetic energy and interfacial tension energy. For magnetic permeability of
the droplet ~=40 it is found that the droplet becomes unstable for a certain magnetic
field threshold: it jumps from a slightly elongated shape to a much more elongated
one. The ratio of semi -axes of the ellipsoidal shape changes from a1b~2 to a1b~13. At
decrease of the field the droplet from the elongated shape a1b~7 reduces to a less
elongated one a/b- 1.5 at a smaller magnetic field threshold value. Such a transition
takes place only if magnetic permeability is high enough, namely if ~>20.8 [89]. In
[25,32] it is shown that the virial method and the energy approach gives equivalent
results. The advantage of the virial method is that it could be used to study
perturbations from the ellipsoidal shape. The virial method is already successfully
used to calculate equilibrium shapes for selfgravitating rotating mass [42,41] and for
rotating charged drops [40,88,89]. The similar results concerning the hysteresis
phenomenon for the elongation of a droplet could be obtained both from virial and
energy approach methods in 2D case. The critical value of a magnetic permeability for
the hysteresis of the 2D droplet deformation in a static magnetic field is ~cr=27. In
some theoretical studies [68,97] it is reported about a conical tip formation for a
ferrofluid droplet and the eventual breakup of it, if a magnetic permeability exceeds
critical value ~=17.59 [68]. Nevertheless, such phenomena was never observed
experimentally for a ferro fluid droplet even for the concentrated phase with ~=40
[11,12,14].
20
Chapter 1
1.2.2. Sessile ferrofluid droplet in a static field
Equilibrium axisymmetric shapes of sessile drops of ferro fluid are studied in
[19] experimentally. In [21] on the basis of the energy balance the elongation of the
droplet is calculated as function of a magnetic Bond number under an assumption that
the shape of a sessile droplet could be described as a half of an axisymmetric
ellipsoid. In [96] the equilibrium state of partially and totally free ferrofluid droplet is
studied by energy minimisation accounting for the gravity. It is found that the
hysteresis phenomena take place if gravitational Bond number Bg = pg(VY/3 /cr IS
larger than critical value BgcR~8.5, P being the density, g : gravity acceleration, V:
volume of a drop, cr : surface tension. It means that for larger gravitational Bond
number values there is some threshold value of magnetic Bond number Bm, beyond
which drop elongates with jump. Decreasing a magnetic field, the jump back to the
less elongated state takes place at smaller value of Bm. The influence of nonlinear
magnetisation of the sessile drop is studied in [17,27,29]. The comparison with the
linear magnetisation shows [27,29] that at low field values both results are very close,
but increasing field above 140 gauss the difference increases and in particular case in
[27] even at a magnetic field 160 gauss the difference in the drop height is about 1.6
times. It should be mentioned that agreement with experimental observations is within
2%, thus it is proved that the nonlinear behaviour of ferrofluids can significantly
affect a drop shape at field strength as low as 140 gauss.
1.2.3. Free ferrofluid surface instability in vertical field
The ferrofluid surface instability in vertical field is one of the most studied
problems of FHD. The first observation and predictions in the frame of the linear
perturbation theory are given in [27]. By theoretical studies many phenomena were
found out: subcritical character of hexagonal pattern structure [51,52,62], transition
from hexagonal pattern to square one [52,62]. Most of predictions are proved
experimentally [13,28]. In [13] the large hysteresis effect due to the high magnetic
permeability /1-40 was observed. Interpretation of the hysteresis on the basis of a
simple model is in reasonably good agreement with experimental data. Periodic
pattern formation in normal field is observed in [19] for thin ferrofluid film. In [83]
21
Chapter I
for hexagonal ferrofluid bubble lattice at some field value abrupt increase of the
magnetic field leads to the following: large initial ferro fluid bubbles droplets shrink
and smaller bubbles appear, together forming inhomogeneous patterns.
1.2.4. Instabilities of ferrofluid in a narrow gap between two parallel
plates
The thin gap between two parallel plates forms the quasi-twa-dimensional
domain. The fluid flow between plates could be described by Darcy equation.
Presence of two fluid phases in the gap one of which is ferrofluid makes a system
where many rather complicate phenomena are observed. In many cases instabilities
lead to non-axisymmetric shapes. Presence of different instabilities in orthogonal with
respect to a layer magnetic field:
• elliptic deformation instability for ferrofluid drops and bubbles III ferrofluid
[36,38];
• bending instability [36,38];
• comblike instability in a vertical gap [37];
leads to the labyrinthine instability [38,92]. Instability of the vertex splitting has been
numerically studied in [34]. The character of these instabilities depends on the
magnetic field magnitude and on the conditions, how a field is applied. Dependence of
the wave number of growing perturbations on ramp rate has been considered in [58].
Here also equivalence of approaches based on fictitious magnetic charges and current
loops around magnetised body has been shown.
Instabilities of the flat layer are quite well studied by numerical simulation. The
magnetic field problem is mostly treated accounting for demagnetising field in the
first nonvanishing approximation (constant magnetisation approximation approach).
Along the same lines the behaviour of the droplet in the field along the boundaries of
the layer has been considered in [20,49]. Fluid flow is approximated by a Hele-Shaw
flow and treated by the boundary integral technique for a flow potential [39]. In [67]
the surface evolution is traced by the dissipative motion of closed 2D curves,
conserving area. The formalism is derived from a general energy functional. The
conformal mapping method for the simulation of the labyrinthine instabilities of
22
Chapter 1
magnetic fluids has been considered in [58]. Computational limitations in most of
cases restrict the studies to the simple patterns of labyrinth structure.
1.2.5. Instabilities of ferrofluid droplet in rotating field
For the first time the response of magnetic fluid micro drops to time dependent
magnetic fields is tested in [10,4]. The concentrated phase of ferrofluid with relatively
high magnetic permeability fl~25 is used. The first stage of shape deformation is an
oblate ellipsoid, the plane of symmetry is one of field rotation. Increasing a magnetic
field, oblate ellipsoid becomes unstable, leading to rather complicate shapes. In a high
frequency rotating field a "starfish shape" for a droplets is observed. The droplet
slowly rotates in the direction of a field, number of arms is proportional to the square
of applied field strength. For lower field frequencies shapes could be more irregular,
including loop-like and worm-like ones. Generally droplet tries to follow a field
rotation, but additional bending effects take place due to friction forces acting from an
external fluid. The ratio of the droplet viscosity versus the external fluid viscosity is
about 100.
Similar results are observed In crossed field: Hx = Hoi J2 ,
Hy = H, sin rot (static field crossed with linearly oscillating one) [10]. As in the case
of a rotating field, the ultimate shape is a disk crowned with peaks. Difference is that
there is no co-rotation of a "cog-wheel". Number of lateral peaks is still proportional
to the square of the field.
By virial method [10,4,35] the symmetry destroying perturbation analysis is
performed for oblate ellipsoid. The number of lateral peaks is explained by the most
unstable perturbation mode, that is found by dispersion equation for surface waves of
flat magnetic fluid surface and by lateral instability of a infinite ferrofluid cylinder.
Still unexplained is the behaviour of the microdroplet at finite surface perturbations,
including slowly rotating distorted worms and reptating snakes, which behaviour
strongly depends on frequency of the magnetic field.
23
Chapter J
1.3. Choice of the characteristical units
In order to obtain non-dimensional form for all equations, used to perform
numerical calculations, some set of characteristical units should be chosen. As
characteristic values are chosen: external field strength Ho, surface tension a, external
fluid viscosity TJexand unperturbed droplet (i.e. circle) radius R. Thus all the processes
are ruled by some non-dimensional numbers, characterising the balance between these
forces. The acting forces in the present work are magnetic forces, surface tension and
viscous stresses. Since surface tension is always present, it is chosen as reference
force. The magnetic forces are characterised by the ratio between the magnetic forces
and surface tension ones, called the magnetic Bond number is defined as
Bm = H~R/O". It is sometimes convenient to incorporate in Bm some multiplier,
containing magnetic permeability f.l mostly because it better corresponds to the nature
of magnetic forces. Here, in the present work it is avoided because usually it helps not
completely to eliminate /l from all equations, governing the certain phenomenon. The
other goal is that the same defmition is kept for all the processes described in the
present work.
In time dependent processes, the characteristic decay time for free surface
perturbations T=TJexR/cris introduced, in fact, this dimensional value characterises the
ratio of viscous forces and surface tension ones. The viscosity of the surrounding fluid
is chosen as the reference one, because the friction forces acting to the rotating droplet
are governed mostly by it. The ratio of viscosities A=TJin/TJexis used to characterise the
system droplet-surrounding media.
These definitions lead to the following definitions of non-dimensional
magnitudes:
• non-dimensional coordinates X=xdimlR,y=y dim/R,
• a non-dimensional velocity v=vdim'TIR,
• a non-dimensional magnetic field H=Hdim/HO'
• a non-dimensional time t=tdimlt,
• a non-dimensional angular frequency Q=Qdim'T,
• a non-dimensional surface force density fs=fs,dim'R!cr.
24
Chapter 1
1.4.Boundary integral equations
1.4.1. Stokes flow
In general case incompressible fluid motion IS described by the momentum
conservation law
d v , ~ acrijp-- = L.,-- + F;, i= 1,2,3,
dt )=\ ax)
and by the continuity equation
(1.1)
div v = o. ( 1. 2 )
Here p denotes the density of the fluid, F, are the components of the volume forces,
acting in the fluid, and dldt refers to the complete derivative, which is defined as
aj 0 t + v .V . The viscous stress tensor ()ij has property of symmetry
cr ij = cit > i= 1,2,3. ( 1.3 )
The law for material properties of a media in the present case is Stokes law
[54,55,66], which for a viscous fluid establishes a connection between stress tensor on
the one hand and the pressure p and the rate-of-deformation tensor
E .. = ~[OVi + av)]
u 2 Ox) Ox;
on the other. Stokes law is of the form
()ij=_P'6ij+T][ov;+OVi], i,j=1,2,3, (1.4)Ox) oXj
T] being the coefficient of dynamic viscosity, connected with the coefficient of
kinematic viscosity v by relation T]=PV. The substitution of (1.4) into the momentum
conservation law (1.1) accounting for the continuity equation (1.2) gives the Navier-
Stokes equation
(1.5)
Dealing with slow viscous flows (so-called creepmg flow [55], Reynolds
number Re = vL pjT] « 1, L: the characteristic dimension of a flow, v: the
characteristic velocity) Navier-Stokes equation could be linearized, that is, non-linear
25
Chapter J
term could be neglected since it is small compared with remaining terms. Other
important simplification could be applied to Navier-Stokes equation when dealing
Ovwith motions of a droplet of small size. In such a case inertial term p - couldat
although be neglected. What results is the Stokes equations for creeping flow,
describing the slow steady flow of a viscous fluid:
-Vp + ll~v + pF = 0,
divv = 0.
What have to be understood by
( 1 .6)
the term "steady flow" in the dynamics of
creeping flow for moving boundaries? Small shift of boundary causes velocity field in
all the domain, but in the same instant this flow is slowed down due to the relatively
large viscosity as a shift velocity is small. If volume forces are present, they are
compensated by pressure and viscous stresses, influence of inertial terms is negligible
as viscosity stresses dominate over inertia effects. The action of potential volume
forces appears as additional pressure on surface. Every instant viscous flow stresses
are compensated only by a pressure and volume forces. The known velocities of the
fluid at boundaries of domains completely determine the flow inside the domains at
given volume forces. Thus inside one fixed domain the problem of time dependent
creeping flow at fixed time instant is equivalent to the steady flow inside the domain
with given volume forces and given velocities at the boundary of this domain.
Since all the flow is driven by surface forces, the boundary integral equation
technique turns out to be very powerful tool to solve the creeping flow problems with
free moving boundaries.
1.4.2. Boundary conditions for a velocity field
The boundary conditions usually are split in kinematic ones and dynamic ones.
The kinematic boundary conditions describes the velocity behaviour at the boundary,
usually it is the continuity of a velocity field [66]:
ill 1 ex IV = V •r r
In particular cases velocity could have prescribed values at the boundary.
( 1 .7)
26
Chapter 1
The dynamic boundary condition expresses the influence of surface forces llf
to the motion of the fluid [66]:
cr~njlr -cr~njlr = ll/;.
H ~ ~ mod .ere stress tensor cr ij = -u ij p + cr ij consists
(1.8)
from the pressure term and from
viscous stresses. In general the discontinuity in the surface force llf is dependent upon
physical properties of fluids as well as upon the structure and thermodynamic
properties of the interface. These thermodynamic properties could involve a number
of physical constants [54,85], including the densities of the fluids, surface tension,
surface elasticity, surface viscosity etc. An interface is called active one if llf "* O. In
the present work the flow of fluids is caused by the surface tension and the magnetic
forces acting to the interface between magnetic liquid droplet and the surrounding
non-magnetic fluid. Thus the boundary condition (1.8) in absence of tangential surface
forces could be written separately for tangent component of viscous stresses:
i/ll exl 0crtn r -cr'/I r = . (1.9)
and for normal ones:
in in ex ex 2 (M)2 / R-p +cr,11l = -p +cr,11l + 1[ n -cr c. (1.10)
Here Rc stays for local curvature radius, which in 2D could be expressed in terms of a
normal vector in the following way: c] Rc = o div n [48].
1.4.3. Boundary integral formulation for a creeping flow
Stokes flow, governed by equations (1.6) has the following properties:
1. The reversibility of Stokes flow: reversing signs for velocity v and pressure p,
reversed flow is mathematically acceptable and physically viable solution [55, 85].
It should be noted that the direction of the force and torque acting on any surface
are also reversed.
2. Uniqueness of solution.
3. Stokes flow accumulates no kinetic energy since the fluid possesses no momentum
and hence, no inertial mass.
27
Chapter 1
4. Rate of viscous dissipation in Stokes flow is lower than that is in any other
incompressible flow that has same boundary values ofthe velocity [55]
Beside that the "Stokes paradox" [55] should be avoided for 2D external flows. The
essence of the Stokes paradox [64] is that a velocity solution of the homogeneous
system (1.6) which is equal to a on boundary S and to given v'" at infinity generally
does not exist. Thus, for 2D streaming motion perpendicular to the axis of a circular
cylinder there exist no solution of the creeping motion equations vanishing on the
cylinder that tends to infinity.
In order to write the boundary integral equations for some vector field, the
corresponding fundamental solutions should be found at first. The fundamental
solutions of a creeping flow were introduced in fact independently by Odqvist [79]
and Lichtenstein [69]. They have constructed the corresponding hydrodynamical
potentials and investigated their properties, and used them to solve the problems of a
creeping flow. The general overviews of the fundamental solution of a creeping flow
could be found in [64,85].
In the present work the boundary integral equations are used to describe the
motion of the 2D magnetic fluid droplet under the action of the external magnetic
field. The boundary integral equation formulation of a Stokes flow is based on 2D free
space Green's functions. In 2D the free space Green's functions of the Stokes flow
represents solutions of continuity equation Vv = a and the singularity forced equation
of Stokes flow [64,85]
-Vp + l1V2V + g<5(r - ro)= a ( 1. 11)
where g is an arbitrary constant vector, ro is an arbitrary point, and <5is the 2D delta-
function, V2 is 2D Laplacian operator. Introducing the free space Green's function G
we wrote the solution for the velocity in the form
1vj(r)= -Gij(r,ro)gJ. (1.12)41t11
Physically, formula (1.8) expresses the 2D flow due to a 2D point force g<5(r -ro)'
Let us introduce the fundamental solutions for the vorticity, pressure, and stress fields:
(1.13)
28
Chapter 1
1p(r) = -Pj(r,ro)gj'4n
1cr ik(r) = 4n Tijk(r, ro )gj"
Stress tensor T is defined by Stokes law [54,66]
(1.14)
(1.15)
(,)_ (,) 8Gij(r,ro) 8Gkj(r,rO)Tijk\.r,rO - -8;kPj\.r,ro +----+----.Oxk Ox;
Pressure vector P and stress tensor T associated
(1.16)
with a free space Green's
function for infinite unbounded or bounded flow, constitute two fundamental
solutions of Stokes flow.
The free-space Green's function for velocity or 2D Stokeslet [54,85] is
x.x .
Gij = -8 ij In r + ~ ' r = lxi, x = r - To • ( 1 . 1 7)r
The associated vorticity, pressure and stress fields are given by (1.13), (1.14), and
(1.15) with
(1.18)
x~=2--f,
r
(1.19)
X.XXkTijk = -4 I .~ • ( 1 . 2 0 )r
For convenience potential volume forces could be incorporated into a modified
pressure. For example, the magnetic volume force ~ V(MH), incorporated in a2
modified pressure under assumption of a constant magnetic permeability gives
mod _ fl-1 nliH2P -P---v\: .8n
Thus the body-foree-free Stokes equation written in terms of pmodis to be considered:
(1.21)
-v»:: + llV2V = O.
The use of (1.21) changes the boundary condition (1.10) to the following form [25]:
_pmOdJII + o".= -rr: + o " + 2rr(Mn)2 + (MH)(2 - rr div n .
1IJ1 nn (1.22)
Further in the text the superscript "mod" for a pressure is dropped, additional
pressure due to a magnetic field appears in boundary conditions.
29
Chapter 1
To describe such a motion, singularities (singular forces) of Green's ftmctions
should be placed on boundaries. So the motion inside the droplet at the point ro is
described by the boundary integral equation, which accounts for forces to acting to
the droplet from the interface of it:
v~'(ro)= ~1j/"(r)Gij(r,ro)1i(r)-_1 1v;(r)Tijk(r,rO)nk(r)di(r). (1.23)
4n11 L 4n L
Here v; (r) stays for the i-th velocity component on the boundary, 11in: the viscosity of
the droplet. Due to the continuity of velocities on the boundary this value is the same
from inside and outside of the droplet. It is convenient to derive another boundary
integral equation from the Lorentz reciprocal identity [55,70], what arrives [85] at
ft;ex (r)G ij(r, <}:il(r )-l1"X 1v, (r )T,ik(r, rO)nk (r )ii(r) = o. ( 1 . 2 4 )
L L
Here A=l1in/11ex, 11ex: the viscosity ofa fluid outside the droplet, fX are the forces acting
to the fluid outside the droplet from the interface of it. Now by combining (1.23) and
(1.24) the boundary integral equation in terms of the surface force ~f = f " - fin
could be written:
v';'(ro) = - 4n~;11 1~.t:(r)Gii(r,ro)1l(r)+
t.
I - A 1 v , (rv; (r, ro)n k (r 'yil (r)4nA L
According to the (1.8) and (1.22) the surface force discontinuity for a linearly
(1.25)
magnetizable ferrofluid droplet is
6.f = c di v n - ~ - 1 ~Il- IXHn y + H 2 ( 1. 2 6 )8n r
In order to obtain the boundary integral equation for velocity on the boundary,
the principal value (PV) of the second right hand side integral in (1.25) is derived as
follows: if L is a Lyapunov line, i.e. it has a continuously varying normal vector, and
the velocity v varies over L in a continuous manner,
PV
lim 1 v;(r)Tljk(r,rO)nk(r'yii(r)=
rn -40 L t.
PV
+2n v j (r) + 1v; (rv; (r, r,)nk (r 'yii(r)
L
(1.27)
30
Chapter 1
where minus sign applies when the point ro approaches L from the internal side, and
the plus sign otherwise. The normal vector is pointed outside from the droplet (see
Fig.l.l). The point rL lays on the boundary contour L and corresponds to the limit
position of the point ro when it tends to L. The superscript PV for a boundary integral
here and further indicates the principal value of the double-layer potential, defined as
the value of the improper double-layer integral corresponding to the case where the
point ro is located on L. Clearly, the double-layer potential undergoes a discontinuity
4nv across L.
Thus use of (1.27) in (1.25) gives the necessary boundary integral equation to
calculate the velocity v(r) on the boundary:
vj(rJ=- ,1 f4f: (r)G'i (r, ro)d/(r) +2ml'x(1+A) I. .
1- A PV
-- J v,(r~k(r,rJnk(x)dI(r)21t(1+A) 1 j
In (1.28) the only unknown is velocity values along the boundary (surface of a 2D
(1.28)
droplet). It will be noted that when the viscosities of the two fluids are equal, i.e. ).~=1,
the coefficients of the double-layer integral on the right-hand side of (1.28) vanish,
and the flow is expressed merely in terms of a single-layer potential with known
density ~f. Two other particular cases, namely A=O and A=OO, requires special
treatment, called the regularization of the double-layer potential. This treatment IS
discussed in details in [64,85], in the present work these cases are not to meet.
The analogue of the equation (1.25) for the velocities outside the droplet is
v:X(ro)= - 41t~eX 1~f(rY:;u(r,ro)d/(r)+
1- A J- ':f Vi (r )TUk (r, rO)nk (r)dl(r)
41t L
The limit ro~L arrives at the same equation (1.28).
(1.29)
So the equation (1.28) is used to obtain the velocity distribution along the
droplet's boundary, once it is calculated, (1.25) and (1.29) could be used to obtain the
velocity distribution in every point of internal and external domains.
31
Chapter I
1.4.4. Partial differential equations for a magnetic field
The equations for a magnetic field follow from the Maxwell's equations. A
magnetic field satisfies the magnetic flux continuity equation
divB = 0 ( 1 .30 )
and the second equation in the case when electric and displacement currents are absent
IS
rotH = 0 ( 1 . 3 1 )
Total magnetic field H is formed by given external magnetic field H, which causes
secondary field H M due to magnetisation of magnetic fluid domain: H = H, + H M .
Throughout the present work a linear magnetisation of magnetic fluid is
assumed:
M = XH (1.32)
where magnetic susceptibility X and therefore magnetic permeability fl = 47tX + 1 are
constant. Thus from relation B = flH it follows that in domains of a continuously
constant magnetic permeability fl magnetic field intensity H satisfies equation
divH = 0,
what leads to Laplace equation for magnetostatic potential:
(1.33)
~qJ = 0 ( 1. 3 4 )
Thus magnetic field intensity has both solenoidal (1.33) and potential (1.31)
character because it is created "from outside" by an external field, magnetisation of
local ferrofluid domains is taken into account by appropriate boundary conditions. It
is convenient according to Fig.l.l denote a magnetostatic potential inside the droplet
by \(11, but a potential outside the droplet denoted by \(1'2 is split in a potential Hor of
an external field and a potential \(12 due to a magnetisation of the droplet:
(1.35)
32
Chapter 1
1.4.5. Boundary conditions for a magnetic field
The boundary between a magnetic fluid (subscript "1") and a surrounding non-
magnetic media (subscript "2") has not special magnetic surface properties, hence the
boundary conditions are conventional, straight-forward following from (1.30), (1.31):
Bl/1 = Bl/2 or ~Hl/l = Hl/2
H,l = H'2·
Boundary conditions for potentials on droplet surface are
(1.36a)
(1.36b)
(1.36c)
(1.36d)
1.4.6. Derivation of boundary integral equations
Directformulation of boundary integral equations
Since surface force formula for a viscous flow (1.22) requires to know tangential
and normal components of a magnetic field, it is convenient to write boundary
integral equations for Hn, HI on the surface inside the ferrofluid droplet. The full
derivation of equations is given in [33].
hird Green's identity in 2D [61]
(1.37)
R(rL,r)= IrL - rl
is a base on which expressions for the potentials \II I' \112, Hor are obtained, taking into
account direction of a normal and identity (1.34):
(1.38)
33
Chapter I
1 PV[ 1 0\v2(r) a ( 1 J]\jJ2 (rJ = - - f In (, ) -- - \jJ2 (r)- In (, ) dl ,
7t L R\rL>r an an R\rL,r
1 jV[ 1 a(Hor) a ( 1 Jl(HOrL)=- J In (,) - (HorJ- In (, ) dl.rt L R\rL>r an an R\rL,r
Subscript "L" is used to denote "observation point" on boundary contour L, for which
(1.39)
(1.40)
equations are written, r without any subscript usually denotes integration coordinate.
An application of the boundary conditions for magneto static potentials (1.36c),
(1.36d) to the following combination of equations (1.38), (l.40):
1l\jJ1 (rJ+ \jJ2(rJ- (HOrL)=
~~Vln 1 [ll a\jJl(r)_a\lf2(rJ_ a(HorL)]dl_
7t L R(rL,r) an an an
1 PV a [ I J- f [ll\lfI(r)-\lf2(r)-(HorJ]- In ~ ) dl
7t L an R rL,r
allows to obtain after simplifications the boundary integral equation in terms of only
one potential \If I:
2 1 11 -1 PV a [ 1 J\jJJ(rJ=-(HorJ--- f \lfl(r)- In ( ) dl.11+ 1 7t fl + 1 L an R rL , r
Derivative along the boundary contour a/ aIL gives a boundary integral equation
(1.41)
for tangential field component H.:
2 1 11-1 PV a [ 1 JH,(rL)= -(Hot)+-- f H,(r)- In ( ) dl.II + 1 rt II + 1 I. an, R rL, r (1.42)
Here identity
o~,[:n [InR(r:J] ~ : [o~,[InR(r:J]
and integration by parts are used. IL denotes the observation point rL coordinates, I :
integration point r, t is a tangent unit vector.
The boundary integral equation for normal component [33]
2 1 11-1 PV a [ 1 JHII(r,)= -(Hoo)- -- f HII(r)- In ~ ) dl
II + 1 7t fl + 1 t. an I. R rL ' r (1.43)
is derived in analogous way.
34
Chapter 1
Indirect formulation of boundary integral equations
There are two indirect boundary integral equation formulations which use two
different physical analogies: surface charge distribution and equivalent surface
currents.
Surface charges
In this case imaginary magnetic surface charges are distributed by density K(rL)
over boundary in such a way that the external field together with the field of charges
satisfies the boundary conditions (1.36). Contour element dl(r) in 2D plane point ro
creates the field
dH(ro) = K(r)dl(r) ro -r2 •Iro - rl
Hence total field for all points ro which belong no to the boundary contour L is
PV
H(ro) = u, + 1 ro - r2 K(r)dl(r). ( 1 .44)
L Iro- rl
Applying boundary conditions in the cases when ro tends from inside and
outside to the boundary point rL the following boundary integral equation for surface
charge density K(rL) is obtained:
7t /l + 1 K(rL)= (HOn(rL))+ 1VK(r) n(rLXrL ~ r) dl. ( 1 .45)
/l - 1 L IrL - rl
Corresponding equations for magnetic field normal and tangent components are
HII(rL)=~K(rJ,/l-1
(,) () jV ()t(rLXrL - r)Ht\rL =HotrL +'j xtr 2 dl.
L IrL -rl
The equation (l.45) turns out to be equivalent
calculated from known values of H,
(1.46)
(1.47)
to (1.43), so Ht could be
35
Chapter 1
Equivalent currents
According to Biot and Savart's law in 2D [65], magnetic induction, created in
point roby surface currents with density j(r) is
B(ro)= n, + ~~j(r)x (ro ;r) dl(r) (1.48)c L Iro - rl
Since j(r) has only z-component, it could be substituted by a modified scalar density
v(r) in such a way that j(r) = ~ v(r) e z : The corresponding boundary integral
equation, which includes boundary conditions (1.36), is
(1.49)
(1.50)
(1.51)
H,(r
L
)= _ 271: v(rL).
1-1-1
One can see, that (1.49) and (1.52) together gives (1.42).
(1.52)
36
Chapter 1
,ex'
,+,'2='V2+HOr
Figure 1.1. The sketch of the magnetic fluid droplet
37
Chapter 1
Conclusions
The boundary integral equation technique allows to formulate the free moving
boundary problem for a ferrofluid droplet in an external magnetic field in terms of
surface values for both velocity and magnetic field. To solve obtained boundary
integral equations, some approximation technique should be used, as well as the
boundary contour itself should be described in a some approximation. The
approximation technique and approximation errors are the subject of the next Chapter
of the present work
The essence of the direct magnetic field problem formulation, presented here, is
to obtain both magnetic field components on the interface of a droplet by solving two
corresponding boundary integral equations. Two kinds of the indirect formulation are
derived here using either magnetic charges or equivalent currents on surface of the
droplet These two indirect formulations are mathematically completely equivalent to
the direct formulation, but the numerical approximation of them, discussed in the next
chapter, could give different levels of approximation errors. It is found that the normal
field component is proportional up to constant factor to a surface charge density but
the tangent component to a surface current density.
The principal difference of the indirect magnetic field problem formulation from
the direct one is that the indirect formulation allows to obtain by a simple integration
the one of two field components when another one is already found
38
Chapter 2
Approximation of boundary integral
equations
2.1. Interpolation of a planar boundary
The two-dimensional boundary may be represented by a planar line. To set up a
boundary element representation, the planar line are traced by a set of marker points
r., i=l ,...,N, numbered in the counter-clock wise direction according to Fig.2.1. In the
numerical algorithm, a contour consists of its marker points and the interpolation
functions between nodes. Cubic-spline interpolation is chosen to provide a smooth
boundary with continuous first- and second-order derivatives [44]. At every time
instant spline approximation is calculated in two steps [45]:
1. Calculation of boundary curve representation by two parametric cubic-spline
functions: x=fx(P), y=fy(P). Initially the "perimeter" length Pi for N-sided polygon
with marker points as vertexes are taken as the values of the parameter p at marker
points, starting with vertex i=l (Pl=O). Then cubic spline coefficients are calculated
for a closed contour, accounting for the periodicity constrain. According to [7I], a
cubic-spline interpolation provides the unique curve, the shape of which is
independent from the choice of Pi'
39
Chapter 2
2. Calculation of natural curve parameter: the arc length for a curve is calculated
P
using the integral s(p)= f~X'2~)+ y'2~)dt. Since the cubic-spline interpolation
P,
is unique, the natural parameter values Si=S(Pj)at corresponding i-th marker points
are unique, too. After the integration the new cubic-spline functions x=fxCs),y=fis)
in dependence on the natural parameter s are recalculated.
40
Chapter 2
2.2. General remarks about discretization of
boundary integral equations
Once the contour of integration is traced by marker points and cubic-spline
interpolation, the approximation of the unknown boundary velocities and magnetic
field components on the boundary inside the droplet could be performed. In the every
element of the contour the local basis functions for unknowns is introduced and
globally unknown values are described by global basis functions which are built from
the local basis functions multiplied by coefficients and added together. The next step
is the approximation of boundary integral equations for given set of boundary
elements. The realisation of this step in so called Boundary Element Method, widely
known as BEM. The accuracy and the numerical stability of obtained numerical
scheme depends on the choice of the approximation technique. Two governing
approximation techniques applied to compute the coefficients of the local expansions
are either the collocation method, or the method of weighted residuals [30,93,85].
The last of two methods are more general and in fact includes the first one as
particular case. The main idea of the collocation method is the requirement to satisfy
the boundary integral equation in N selected points, leading to the set of N linear
algebraic equations. In the method of weighted residuals the integral equation is
multiplied sequentially by every of N weighting functions in order to obtain the set of
N linear algebraic equations after an integration along the boundary contour. For the
method of weighted residuals different choices of the weighting functions lead to
different schemes with varying degrees of complexity. Identifying the weighting
functions with the global basis functions we obtain Galerkin's method, while
identification of the weighting functions with delta functions having poles at selected
points over the boundary contour gives the collocation method. In [85] the Galerkins
method is recommended only for problems with notable geometrical simplicity due to
"increased computational requirements". In fact, obtained set of algebraic equations is
harder to derive but once it is derived, calculations by computer can have the same
level of complexity. In engineering boundary element methods almost all the codes
are based on collocation methods. It is known that the right choice of the collocation
points is significant for the stability and convergence of the approximation [30].
41
Chapter 2
Preparing computer code for magnetic field calculations it was found that the
collocation method gives the less accuracy than the Galerkin's method at the same
CPU time consummation. Hence in the present work the Galerkin's method is used to
derive sets of linear algebraic equations for the both magnetic field and creeping flow
equations, using pyramidal functions (see Fig.2.2) [33] defined as
o
() (S-Si_l)/(Si -Si_l) Si-l i(S)dS =
L i=l i=l L
NI u., (~i-l 8i,k+i + ~i 8i,k-1 + 2(~i_1 + ~i)8i,k )/6
i=1
(2.7)
Here
Ss, = Si+l - Si·
Use of the approximation inside the interval [Sj,Si+I]
rei + 1)- rei) .r ~-----
s Ss.
1
(2.8)
for an integration of the first term in the right-hand side of the equation (2.6) results in
J (XH H )d H xk+! - Xk_1 H Yk+1 - Yk-l'j(j)kS oxxs+ OyY, s= ox 2 + OY 2 .
L
JPv N :To evaluate the second term j(j)k (s1f~ H,) (j)i (s') R(s, s')ds' ds in the right-hand
(2.9)
side of the equation (2.6) the integral in square brackets is evaluated by trapezoidal
rule:
1(j)i(S')R(s,s')ds' ~R(S,SJ!1si-12+ ~i ,
L
and the outer integral also evaluated by trapezoidal rule gives:
(2.10)
JPV N ]!1s +~.!1s + ~ .q(j)k(s1f~Hliq>i(S')R(s,s')ds'dS~Rki 1-12 I k-'2 k.
L
Thus the discrete analogue of the equation (2.2) is
(2.11)
~ A+H . = (\k~' - Xk_1)Hox + (Yk+1 - Yk-I )HoyL... kf ',I I ' k = 1,... ,N,
i=1 ~ +
where
(2.12)
(2.13)
Iki = (!1si_18 i.k+I+!1si 8i.k-I + 2(!1si-J+ !1si)8 i.k )/6. ( 2 . 1 4 )
In similar way the discrete equation for the normal component of a magnetic field
(1.43) is derived arriving at
(2.15)
44
Chapter 2
The definition of A;; is already given in (2.13).
Separation of the external field components
Due to the linearity of the field equations, the solution of them could be split in two
parts: two fields created separately by Hox and HOY,which are described by variables
HII i = U X i H, x + U Y i HOY'.. . (2.16)
(2.17)HI,i = ~X.i Hox+~y,i HOY·
The corresponding equations are easy to obtain from (2.12),(2.15):
k=I, ...,N, (2.18)
k=l, ...,N, (2.19)
k=l, ... ,N, (2.20)
k=I, ...,N. (2.21)
This approach is used to obtain the time-averaged field term H; + 11 H~ in the
effective surface force in Chapters 3 and 4, where a 2D ferrofluid droplet in a high-
frequency field is considered.
The shape periodicity of the droplet
In the case of the periodical shape with K periods, the angle occupied by the complete
period is YI=2n/K. If the number of marker points per period is N, then between the
marker point i and the corresponding marker point i+jNp are j full periods. To derive
transformation formulae, which bound together these two points, the magnetic field
components Hox' and Hoy·in coordinates X' ,Y' rotated by the angle Yj=jYlwith respect
to X,Y coordinates, are introduced (see Fig.2.3):
Hox' = Hox cos Yj + HOYsin Yj ,
HOY'= HOYcosYj - Hoxsin Yj •
Due to the periodicity
(2.22)
(2.23)
H ." =Uv' Hox'+uy HOY'.11.1+}lV f' ,\ .J ,I (2.24)
45
Chapter 2
Collecting together (2.22)-(2.24) and accounting for (2.16) gives
a x i+J"N Hox + a Y i+J"N HOY='p 'p (2.25)
a X,i (Hox cos Y ) + HOYsin y})+ a Y,i (Hoycos Y ) - Hoxsin y}
The separation of field components yields
{
a \"i+J"N = a x i cos Y J' - a Y i sin y J' ,~'P' •
aY,i+}Np =aX,i siny} +aY.i cosy}"
In a similar way
(2.26)
{
p X,i+}Np = ~X,i cosy} - PY,i sin t ..
PY,i+}Np =PX,i siny} +PY,i cosy;"
(2.27)
Thus the account for the periodicity of the shape gives two sets of linear algebraic
equations with matrices 2Npx2Np, implemented in Chapter 3. The values of unknowns
ax, ay, Px, Py depend only on the geometry of the problem and from )..I.. Thus these
values are a useful tool to perform calculations for an arbitrary external field. Once
calculated, they allow easy to obtain magnetic field on the boundary according to
(2.16),(2.17).
The accuracy of the magnetic field calculations
The accuracy of the magnetic field calculation here is tested by few examples for the
elliptic shape of the droplet. The exact field solution inside the ellipse is well known
[65]:
H-H a+b H a s b- ox ---+ Oy ---a + )..I.b b + )..I.a
Here the major semi-axis a is orientated in X-axis direction, b stays for minor semi-
(2.28)
axis of the ellipse. To check the accuracy, both analytical and numerical values for the
non-dimensional geometry-dependent magnetic field characteristics ax, ay, Px, Py (see
formulae (2.16), (2.17)) are plotted versus the contour arc length s in Fig.2.4 and
Fig.2.5, number of marker points N=200, magnetic permeability )..1.=15,a ratio of
semi-axes a1b=16. The difference between Fig.2.4a and Fig.2.4b is that in Fig.2.4a the
marker point distribution on the contour with equal arc lengths between them is used,
but in Fig.2.4b the distribution is dependent on the local curvature: in the places with
46
Chapter 2
large curvature the density of marker points is larger in such a way that the distances
between marker points are proportional to the curvature radius. To prevent too high
accumulation of marker points in some places causing absence of them in other
locations the upper and lower limits of distances between marker points are
introduced. Such a curvature-dependent distributions allows essentially improve the
field calculation accuracy in the regions of a contour with large curvature (for
example, the tips of a 2D droplet). The variable ax and hence the normal magnetic
field component on tips exhibit an impulse-like increase, which is a source for the
saw-tooth type oscillations (see Fig.2.4). In Fig.2.4b the implementation of a
curvature-dependent marker point distribution suppresses these oscillations, for ~x
they are insignificant, but for ax there is still presence of them in very tip of an ellipse.
In fact, the saw-tooth type oscillations about the exact solution are eventual origins for
breakup of the numerical algorithm: an artificially elevated field value causes the
elevation of a surface force leading to the formation of a sharper tip and thus
increasing again the elevation of calculated field. In Fig.2.5 the plot of variables ay, ~y
versus the contour arc length displays, that the field component which is perpendicular
to the direction of a droplet elongation, plays less role for surface force. Other point is
that the accuracy for these variables are higher but the comparison with equidistant
distribution (not shown here) shows that there is no real improvement in the present
case for ay, ~Y'
47
Chapter 2
2.4. Equations for the motion of a free boundary
To make discretization of the boundary integral equation for velocities on the
boundary (see the equation (1.28))
1- A r-v»:
V (ro)- -- Jv i (xv; (r, rO)nk (r}il(r) =
J 2n(l+A) L
_ 1 J~J:(r)Gij(r,ro}il(r)
2nll1 (1 + A) L
the collocation technique [30,9330] is applied, nevertheless this approach is similar to
(2.29)
that of a magnetic field discussed above. The difference from magnetic field
equations appears in treatment of singularities: both the logarithmic singularity of
G ij (r, ro) and the singularity of Tijk (r, ro) require special treatment at the singularity
point r=ro. The equation (2.29), in fact, represents two coupled equations, because
both components of the velocity vector, Vx and vy are implemented in the right hand
side of it. The discretization of this equation by N boundary elements (marker points)
leads to the set of linear algebraic equations of order 2N x2N.
For the regular boundary element the conventional trapezoidal rule is used. To
evaluate the term Vi(r)Tijk (r, rO)nk (r) at singularity r=ro, the relations
xes) - x(so) = x,(so )(s - so)+ x,s(so )(s - SoY /2 + o«s - soY ,
nx(s) = Y,(s) = Y,(so) + y,Jso )(s - so)+ o«s - soY ,
n,(s) = -xJs) = -x,(so) - x,,(so )(s - so)+ o«s - soY
are used in infinitesimal neighbourhood of So arriving at
X,XXk
Vi (r )Tijk (r, r0 )nk (r}is = -4 I ~ Vi (r)nk (r}is =r
-4(x, v x + Ys V r )is x,,) ds x
[(y, + y"ds Xx,ds + x" ds2 /2 )- (x, + x s,ds V sds + YIS ds2 /2) J
ds
=
ds4
-2x,,) (x, vx+ y, vYXx,y" - y,x,.,}is.
Therefore the approximation of the integral in the left-hand side of the equation (2.30)
(2.30)
gives
48
Chapter 2
PrYol.Jvi(r)Tijk(r,r(p)}k(r)dl(r)~ -D;i -. =
L
N xj(m) - xj(p)-22: 4 (~r(m,p)v(m))(~r(m,p)n(m)XLUIII_l + LU".)-
111=1 l~r(m,p)1
m.",p
xs)p)(rs(p)v(p))(xsYss - YsXssXLUp-l + LUp)
(2.31)
~r(m,p) = x(m)-x(p), &/m,p) = x/m)-x/p).
Here ro in (2.29) corresponds to the p-th marker point. For singular boundary element
approximation both the result of the exact integral
CJ ) (In C 1)(a+bx)lnxdx =ac(lnc-l)+bc- ---
024
and the property that surface forces have only normal component are used. It leads to
(2.32)
the following approximation formula:
J f xx)tlf(r \ -8ij lnr + ~/ dl(r)~ F; =
L
I[~f(m)lnl&(m,p)l- &/m,p) ~fk(m) &k(7'P)] x (LUIII_1+ LUm) +
m=l 1&(m,p)1 2
lJI:;tp
±~fk(P)[~P lnl&(p + l,pt + LUp_1lnl&(p, p -It - 3(LUp_1 + ~p)}-
», I ( ) LUp ( )-----;f- ~fk P - 1 - 4 ~fk P + 1
(2.33)
Here
&(m,p) = x(m)- x(p), &/m,p) = xi(m) - x Jp).
Inserting (2.31), (2.33) in (2.29) we arrive at the set of linear algebraic equations
2SI Dij Vi = r; i= 1,2, ... ,2N , (2.34)
i=l
where
V; = vx(j), j = 1,2,... ,N,
V/_v = v y(j), j = 1,2, ... ,N,
1- Ie •
Dij = 2n(l + Ie) Dij'
49
Chapter 2
1 •F=-----F.
I 21t1l1(1+A) I
After solution of the set (2.34) the shift of the i-th marker point during the time step
!'i.t in normal to the contour direction is obtained by
!'i.r( i) = (n x (i) V (i) + n y (i) V (i + N) ~t n( i) (2.35)
The accuracy of the boundary velocity calculations
The accuracy of the obtained boundary velocities was tested by the dynamical
simulation of the droplet with small elliptical perturbation from circular shape: the test
of droplet contraction due to surface tension. The decrement of the perturbation
measured by non-dimensional major semi-axis of the ellipse is obtained in [33] from
a" -1 _ a; -1 ( t)-----exp ---
a aD 1 + A
and is equal to 1/(1+A). In Fig.2.6 the results of this test are shown for five different
(2.36)
values of A=O; 0.5; 1; 2; 5. The equidistant marker point distribution was used,
number of marker points N=100, time step !'i.t=O.01.Solid lines represent results from
the formula (2.36), by dotted lines results from numerical simulation are shown. Small
shift between solid and dotted lines is caused mainly by initial values of perturbation,
which is too large to obtain an almost identical fit by (2.36). Nevertheless the fit is
rather good, and for t>2 solid and dotted lines have nearly the same inclination with
respect to the time axis, thus showing excellent agreement for perturbation decrement
between the analytical solution by small perturbation theory and the numerical
simulation started from the initial state with slightly elliptic shape.
The conservation of fluid volume is implemented in boundary integral equations by
use of appropriate Green's functions. The accuracy of the approximation of them is
directly connected with volume conservation during the numerical simulations. Two
simulation tests were carried out to check the numerical accuracy of volume
conservation:
1. Static field test: static magnetic field, characterised by Bm=15, 1l=15, number
of marker points N=200 with curvature dependent distribution of them, default
time step ~t=O.O1. Transition motion of a droplet was simulated starting from
50
Chapter 2
a circular shape. The volume conservation error was 0.25% during 990 time
steps, time interval t,-to=9. 9.
2. Rotating field test: rotating magnetic field, characterised by Bm=105, 11=5,
QH=0.8, number of marker points N=200 with curvature dependent
distribution of them, default time step ~t=0.01. Transition motion of a droplet
was simulated starting from a steady state shape. The volume conservation
errors were:
2.1. 3.4% after 500 steps, time interval t 1-to= 1.14;
2.2. 7.2% after 1000 steps, time interval tTto=2.34;
2.3. 20% after 2710 steps, time interval trto=6.29.
These two tests shows that volume conservation was almost good. the overall
performance is close to that of [97], where a ferrofluid droplet was considered in the
static field, the errors were less than 0.1% over several hundred time steps. In the
cases of rapid motion conservation was poor, with errors as 1% over 10 time steps
[97], and the drop dimensions were rescaled in order to correct the volume.
Throughout the present work forced volume conservation was used via rescaling of
droplet dimensions after every time step, because the change of droplet dimensions
leads to different effective time scaling unit and to different magnetic Bond number.
thus changing the conditions of droplet behaviour. To improve the accuracy of
numerical simulations, the time step was adjusted in every time iteration in such a
way that for every marker point displacement during current time step was limited by
20% of distance to the nearest neighbour point.
The accuracy of the surface force approximation was tested by checking magnetic
field threshold in high-frequency rotating magnetic field (see Chapters 3 and 4). To
obtain it the inverse value of a decrement for elliptic shape perturbation is plotted
versus magnetic Bond number Bm. The straight line plotted through the obtained
points should intersect the zero-line at the threshold value of Bm. Results are shown
in Fig.2.7a (11=10) and Fig.2.7b (11=25). The error is smaller than 0.5% in both cases.
The equidistant marker point distribution was used, number of marker points N=200.
time step ~t=0.0 1.
51
Chapter 2
;. 11ut-
o d .~.
"" J..1lin-~ 0 N,
Figure 2.1. Approximation
of a 2D droplet boundary
by marker points
1
o o
Figure 2.2. The defmition of
the pyramidal function
I
Figure 2.3. Periodic symmetry of a 2D droplet
52
Chapter 2
(a) Equidistant marker point distribution
.IJ.bJ!JJ./1a,--
0.5 Nurn. Anal.0ססoo ~x --_ •
0.0
I
I
I
I
I
-0.5 ~
Jl=15, a/b=16, N=200
o 4 8 12 16
Contour arc length
(b) Curvature-dependent marker point distribution
0.0
Nurn. Anal.
0ססoo ~x --- •
0.5
.IJ.bJ!JJ./1a--x
Jl=l5, a/b=16, N=200
-0.5
o 4 8 12 16
Contour arc length
Figure 2.4. The magnetic field characteristics ax, ~xversus
the contour arc length;
(a): the equidistant marker point distribution,
(b): the curvature dependent marker point distribution.
Definitions of ax, ~x: Hn=axHox+a;Ioy Ht=~xHox+~)HoY
53
Chapter 2
Curvature-dependent marker point distribution
0.10
0.05
Num. Anal.
[JJD[IJ ~y - - _.
0000<> uy--
0.00
-0.05 ~=15, a1b=16, N=200
-0.10
o 4 8 12 16
Contour arc length
Figure 2.5. The magnetic field characteristics uy, ~y versus
the contour arc length, the curvature dependent marker point
distribution. Definitions of uy, ~y: H,=uxHox +u~oY, Ht=~xHox +~yHoY
o Accuracy test
...............................~::?
N=lOO
tlt=O.Ol
A. = TJin!TJex
-- Small pert.
theory
..............Num. simul.
-3 o 1 3 42
Time t
Figure 2.6. The small perturbation decrement test:
the contraction of the droplet.
54
Chapter 2
(a) Field threshold (J.l= 10)
20 25 30 35
Magnetic Bond number H2RJa
(b) Field threshold (J.!=25)
7
N=200
~t=O.Ol
.D
16 18 20 22 24
Magnetic Bond number H2RJa
Figure 2.7. The magnetic Bond number threshold value test
in high-frequency magnetic field.(a) J.!=10, (b) ).1=25.
55
Chapter 3
I-ligh-frequency rotating magnetic
field: the energy approach.
3.1. Shape generation for energy calculations
The behaviour of a magnetic fluid droplet under the action of the high-frequency
rotating magnetic field is considered under the assumption that the characteristic time
of the droplet shape relaxation is much larger than the period of the rotating field and
thus the time averaging with respect to the rotating field period is possible. The
subject of studies is the calculation of the equilibrium shapes, characterised by an
absence of flow if the eventual internal rotation of ferroparticles of a magnetic fluid is
neglected. Under such assumptions the equilibrium shape corresponds to the
minimum of the total energy of the droplet, formed by the sum of a magnetic energy
and a surface energy. Further in this Chapter by magnetic field strength is understood
the amplitude of a rotating field.
Thus the equilibrium shape at given magnetic field value, characterised by
magnetic Bond number Bm=H2R/cr, could be found from some initial shape, for
example, by the variational technique, varying the shape of the droplet. In fact, such a
minimisation of the total energy of the droplet changing its shape could be rather
computer time consuming, since in every iteration the magnetic field have to be
calculated for the new shape of a droplet. The variational technique is used, for
example, in [27],[29] to calculate the equilibrium state of sessile ferrofluid drops in
the case of non-linear rnagnetisation of a ferrofluid, applying the finite element
method to calculate a magnetic field.
57
Chapter 3
Concerning the time dependent magnetic field amplitude, the energy approach
to shape calculation could be used only to calculate equilibrium shape at every time
instant, if the inertia of the system plays no role in the current process. One of the
processes without account for inertia is the creeping flow, considered here. The time
history of the transition motion in the case of the time-dependent magnetic Bond
number thus is substituted by "stroboscopic" shape series. Here it is proposed to
detect these series of droplet's shapes in the external homogeneous magnetic field
from the set of families of symmetric shapes, generated a priori for different numbers
of spikes. The main point is how to generate the families of shapes. In the paper [7*]
(included in the present Chapter) these families are obtained from the conformal map
of the circle in the w plane with radius r >
W-(Il-I)
z = w+ --, (3.1 )n -1
transformed in order to obtain more elongated spikes and widen in such a way the
families of shapes. The number of spikes is given by n. Two control parameters, 8 and
E (see [7*] for more details), allow to control the curvature radius at the tip of every
spike and the length of the spikes. The expression (3.1) gives the contour in a-plane
described by the following parametric equations after the substitution
w = (l + 8) exp( hp ) , i denotes the imaginary unit:
f cos(n -l)
+ (n -1)(1 + 8 )" ) { sin(n -1)
- ( X )" }n-l 1+8 q:> E [O,2n J In order to widen the families of shapes, the curves are at first transformed to the (3.2) polar coordinates (p = p(8, q:», a = «(8,
0 is a control parameter by change of which arbitrary spike length could be obtained. After application of the rule (3.3) the droplet is rescaled back to the 58 Chapter 3 "volume" of the circular droplet, characterised by the magnitude of the non- dimensional are Sc=1t enclosed by the boundary contour of the droplet. At given magnetic Bond number control parameters are varied and the local minima are found. Thus, tracing the energy minima for some magnetic Bond number interval, the behaviour of the droplet in time-dependent magnetic field is detected without real account on transition phenomena. The shapes of droplet are found as the equilibrium shapes and so they correspond to the stationary state that establishes when transitions decay down at the constant magnetic field. In general this approach could be extended to the time-dependent magnetic Bond number, if the rate of the Bond number changes is small enough for the transition decay. Some shapes, generated by transformation of (3.1) are juxtaposed in Fig.3.l and Fig.3.2 with shapes from dynamical simulation from Chapter 4, regarded as almost "exact" ones, since there are no constraints made concerning the shape of a droplet. Fig.3.1 displays that the analytically generated shapes can not describe very well both the curvature radius at the tip and the shape of the "body" of the droplet where the "star-arms" come together. Thus the analytically generated droplet in comparison with the one from dynamical simulation has either too sharp tips or the "necking" in the places where arms join together. In fact, for Fig.3.1(b) this "necking" effect for shapes generated by formula (3.1) and the consequential shape transformation, may cause magnetic field defects leading to the essential change of the magnetic energy. Fig.3.2 displays that even small spikes could not be described very exact by the present shape generation technique. Nevertheless the present shape generation is still the best found one and allows to obtain important results, as it follows in [7*]. Improvement of the shape generation technique should lead to the more accurate results but not to some qualitatively new effect. 59 Chapter 3 Dynamic simulation: Bm=200, Jl=25, N=350 (a) .-Simulation ~~ .-E:1.58, 8:0.04_-=====;;;.--~ '-E-0.18, 0-0.02---- -8 o 8 (b) E=3.64,0=0.021 tSimulation -6 o 6 Figure.3.l: Analytically generated shapes juxtaposed with a dynamically simulated one: (a) 2-spike shapes, (b) 3-spike shapes. 60 Chapter 3 Dynamic simulation: Bm=45, ~= 15, N=450 r, \ "~'. \"":'" "-. .. ,. .. \•..• .... ". . •..•. ',', ----- ,..... ,,- » E=3.56.8=0.162 .... · 'Jl. .. ::::::'.., "" .': ..' \ E=2.68,8=0.128 ~ E=1.36,8=0.06 Simulation I -4 Ia I4 Figure.3.2: Analytically generated shapes juxtaposed with a dynamically simulated one. 61 Chapter 3 Included paper: I.-C. Baeri, A.Cebers, S.Laeis, R.Perzynski Shapes of 2D magnetic fluid droplets in a rotating magnetic field Magnitnaya Gidrodinamika, 1995, N3 (accepted to publish) 63 Chapter 3: included paper Shapes of 2D Magnetic Fluid Droplets in a Rotating Magnetic Field J.C.Bacri (*), A.Cebers (**), S.Lacis(**),R.Perzynski(*) (*) Universite P.M.Curie, 4 place Jussieu, 75252 Paris, Cedex 05, France (**) Latvian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Physics, Salaspils-l, LV-2169, Latvia Abstract The families of equilibrium figures of 2D magnetic fluid droplets in high-frequency rotating magnetic field are found numerically. The magnetic field energy is calculated by a boundary integral equation technique for nonlinear transformed and smoothed hypocycloidal curves. Comparison between families with different number of spikes shows that the lowest energy corresponds to the "two-spikes" shape. A minimum energy calculation shows that for a fixed number of spikes, these spikes arise at a given threshold in magnetic Bond number. Increasing magnetic Bond number, the spikes sharpens. Finally some conclusions concerning the discrepancy with the experimental results are pointed out. l.In troduction Droplets of magnetic fluid (MF) under the action of an external magnetic field show rather intricate behaviours [1-3]. Phenomena of particular interest are arising with MF droplets under the action of a rotating magnetic field [4]. Several different shape transformations are observed experimentally and explained theoretically by a linear stability analysis [4,5]. Among them, the sequence of shape transformations "oblate-prolate-oblate" is followed by the arising of the "star-fish" configurations. In [4,5] an analysis of the fastest growing mode of a 2D magnetizable liquid cylinder under the action of a transversal rotating 64 Chapter 3: included paper magnetic field is considered. A good agreement with the dependence of the number of the "star-fish" arms as function of the magnetic field strength is obtained. Nevertheless from a theoretical point of view the transitions between "star-fish" configurations with different number of arms, observed in the experiment [4], are remaining unexplained. In the frame of the 2D model mentioned above, we study the transitions between configurations with different numbers of arms through an analysis of the MF droplet energy in high-frequency rotating fields. We also look for the transitions between different possible configurations from an energetical point of view. An analysis, based on the choice of particular families of shapes reflecting the formation of sharp tips at the development of the MF instabilities [6,7], is undertaken in this paper. From the calculation of energy minima of shape families with different number of tips, we conclude that deepest minimum corresponds to the two-spikes shape of 2D MF droplet. It is in good accordance with the results of numerical simulations of the hydrodynamics of a 2D MF droplet [8] but not with the experimental observations of an increasing number ofarrns of the MF "star-fishes" with the field strength [4]. Thus the results of the present work show that, for the full understanding of the observed transitions between different "star-fish" configurations, the theoretical model must evidently account for 3D effects and possibly internal rotations and shear flows. The numerical method of the present work is based on the boundary integral equation technique which has been used previously for the calculation of the elongation of the MF droplet in constant field [9] and the study of 2D droplet behaviour under the action of the magnetic field and shear flow [10]. 2. Numerical algorithm The approximate shape of a 2D droplet can be found from an energy minimum analysis, taking into account both magnetic and surface energies. In this case transient fluid motion and internal rotation effects are neglected. The method described below allows, to find the shape corresponding to a minimum of the total energy of droplet from a given family of shapes and at a given magnetic field strength: 65 Chapter 3: included paper ( 1) Here tilde denotes dimensional form of energy, c is for surface tension, L is the perimeter of the droplet, 1\1 is the magnetization of MF inside the droplet, and flo is the external magnetic field. The family of shapes is given a priori and the figures of equilibrium are obtained within some approximation, its accuracy depends on a successful choice of the family of shapes. All along the paper, reduced quantities without dimension are used: non-dimensional energies are obtained with respect to the surface energy of a circular droplet E; = 2rrcrR, magnetic field with respect to external field Ho and non-dimensional values of droplet size with respect to the radius R of an unperturbated droplet. As a result, the figures of equilibrium H2Rare constructed as a function of the magnetic Bond number Bm = _0_ .c Thus the non-dimensional surface energy is: LE -- s - 2rrR· (2 ) The non-dimensional magnetic energy for the linear part of the MF magnetization curve (magnetic permeability ~ = const) in a homogeneous external field is: ll-l I--Em = ---2 Bm HHodS.100 s Last relation accounting for divH = 0, can be rewritten as 11-1 J(--) E/II = -100 2 Bmg Hor I}{"dl. r (3) The boundary integral equation technique [I 0] is used to calculate the normal component of the magnetic field strength H" on the droplet surface (the normal points outside of the droplet): H I = _2_H_ox__ 3x + _2_H_oy__ 3y +~_(~_-_l)~ H (1')1 xu.r, __ dl_'_ "r (1l+1)3n (~+l)3n rr(1l+1)r" r ' ~x/+y/ K(ll')= x,(y' - y)- y,(x' -x) , (y' _ y)2 + (x' _ X)2 ( 4 ) As it follows from relation (3), for energy calculations, the equation for the normal field component must only be solved. 66 Chapter 3: included paper For that, at first, the boundary contour is approximated by a finite number of marker points connected together by interpolating cubic spline functions. The arc length between marker points depends on the local curvature of the contour and the periodicity of the contour is taken into account. The boundary integral equation (4) is solved by an expansion of the normal component in pyramidal functions and using Galerkin's method. The pyramidal ( 5 ) An approximation technique is described in [10] for the case of equal arcs lengths. In the present work this approximation technique is used for a non-uniform distribution of the marker points as described above. It leads to the following set oflinear algebraic equations: ~ {'A = ~ (' [R -I l= HOY (Xi+1 -Xi-\)- HOX(yi+1 - Yi-JL J k ik L J k ik ik II + 1 ' k=1 k=l r- H,ll)Jxi + yi = 1(1)= IJ; 642 m x"ux+Y"u.v J?' 2·7t ,,=1 X,-(I)+Y, (I) ( 1 4 ) 3. Families of the figures of equilibrium The family of shapes, taken for the energy minimization problem, are build up looking for the conformal map of the circle in the w plane with radius r > w-(,,-l) n -1 ( 1 5 )z=w+ It gives the contour in z plane described by the following parametric equations: - ( cos(n -1)
= ) we now have a finite value which, at 8 < < 1, can be
taken as
The family of shapes corresponding to the n-spike "star-fish" configurations is constructed as
follows. For the radius of the curvature at the tip rc =n82 the value S 21n (8 =s/n) is
chosen. For definite values of S = n8 = ~ nrc, curves corresponding to the parametric
representation (16) are constructed. For each value of S , the curves with the equation in polar
coordinates p = p (a) are transformed according to the following power:
I (p(a )JEp (a)= Pmin -.-
PmlO
( 17)
Here P min is the minimal distance of the contour to the origin of the coordinates and f: a
parameter which varies from 0 to some limiting value determined by the accuracy of
calculations (elongated "star-fish" arms with sharp tips require too many marker points for a
reasonable accuracy). After all these transformations the area enclosed by the contour is set
back to nR2 by a linear scaling. At first the area of transformed contour is calculated as
N
s, = ~ ~ (XiYi+l - Xi+1Yi
and thus the scaling factor is obtained as
r; = ~n/Sc·
The family of shapes constructed for n=3 and 6 at S = 0.1 and S = 0.4are shown in Fig.I.
One can see that tips at S = 0.1 are much sharper.
The numerical calculations of energy minimization, according to the relations (11,12,14)
for the more realistic "star-fish" configurations (17), are carried out for 4 fixed values of S
(0.1 ;0.2;0.4;0.8). The values of the parameter f: , corresponding to the minima of the droplet
energy (1,2,14), are thus found for different numbers of spikes. In Fig.2,4a,5,6,7 an energy
70
Chapter 3: included paper
normalization is carried out to have a better representation: the total energy of circular droplet
Eco being subtracted from the energy of the droplet.
In Fig.2 the calculated energy minimum is presented as a function of the magnetic Bond
number for S = 0.2. Each curve in Fig.2 corresponds to a given number of spikes on the
droplet surface. Small overshots above the energetical level of circular droplet are connected
with hysteresis phenomena and are discussed in details below. From this picture several
important conclusions can be drawn. As it can be seen from Fig.2 energy curves for different
numbers of spikes do not cross each other. That means that it is difficult to expect from the
energetical point of view in the framework of 2D model transitions between "star-fish"
configurations with different number of spikes. One can mention that it is not the case, for
example, for 2D polarized droplets in amphiphile mono layers [14], where an intersection
between energetical curves corresponding to the configurations with different number of
lobes, has been found, if the shape is given in polar coordinates as
( 1 8 )
where n denotes the number of lobes, and S is the relative amplitude of the undulation. This
shape, for the present problem, gives worse results (larger energy) than smoothed
hypocycloidal curves and therefore is not discussed.
Besides that, as one can see from Fig.2, the elliptic configuration has always a smaller
energy than any configurations considered even including a "star-fish" configuration with two
spikes S 2: 02 (it is not exactly true in the case of S = 0.1, see Fig.S).
It should be also pointed out that this conclusion is in agreement with the results of the
direct numerical simulation [8] of the dynamics of the 2D magnetic fluid droplet in a rotating
field. It shows that, starting from a randomly perturbated state and going through intermediate
stages with a definite number of the spikes, the system ends up with the 2 spikes
configuration. That means that the physical explanation of the observation in experiment [4]
of transitions between configurations with different number of "star-fish" spikes, must be yet
found. Another issue which should be mentioned concerning Fig.2, concerns the first order of
the transition to "star-fish" configurations characterised by same hysteresis phenomena. These
71
Chapter 3: included paper
a plateau and the droplet shape slides down along the energy curve to the state of smaller
energy which corresponds to an elongated shape.
Decreasing the magnetic Bond number, the droplet conserves its elongated shape at
subcritical conditions till the second critical value of Bm corresponding to the turning point
in Fig.3. The energy minimum of an elongated shape disappears (Fig.4b) and the droplet
restores its circular shape with a jump-like decrease of its energy (FigAa).
The influence of the spike shape on the energy minimization calculations is illustrated for
a two-spikes "star-fish" in Fig.5; for a comparison, the energy of the elliptical droplet is also
shown. The first kind transitions to "star-fish" configurations are shown by vertical lines. The
threshold value is a function of the parameter S which controls the sharpness of the spike. It
can be concluded that for almost all the magnetic Bond numbers the elliptical shape has the
smallest energy in comparison with different two-spike configurations.
As one can see from Fig.6, the same conclusion can be drawn also with respect to the 4-
spike "star-fish" configurations. It is interesting to note that the values of the magnetic Bond
number, for the first-kind transition threshold to the "star-fish" configuration, decrease as the
parameter S increases. Transitions between curves corresponding to the different values of
the parameter S are also possible. So according to Fig.6, "star-fish" configuration arises at
the threshold with rather rounded small tips which are growing sharper and sharper as the
magnetic field strength increases.
The behaviour of the MF droplet described above for different numbers of spikes
(n=2,4,6) is summarized in Fig.7 for S = 0.1,0.2,0.4,0.8. For each number of spikes, the curve
corresponds to the minimal energy from the set S = 0.1,0.2,0.4,0.8 at each Bm. For n=4 this
choice of the curve of minimal energy is illustrated by the path A-B-C-D-E-F -0 in Fig.6 and
Fig.7. Discontinuities for a given "star-fish" configuration correspond to a transition to a state
of smaller energy, that is here to a lower value of the sharpness parameter S . In reality the
curve obviously must be smooth due to the continuous variations of the parameter S . Fig.7
shows that despite of the free variations of the parameter S , it is only the two-spike
configuration, or even the elliptic one, which have the smallest energy. That means that for a
74
Chapter 3: included paper
pure 2D MF droplet, in the rotating magnetic field, a transition to a two-spike structure must
take place. Numerical simulation results of the hydrodynamics of the MF droplet which will
be published elsewhere [8] are in fair agreement with that conclusion. That means that
physical mechanisms leading experimentally to the increase of the number of spikes with the
increase of rotating field strength, includes 3D effects or viscous flow around the droplet: tip
effects are more important at 3D than at 2D.
4.Conclusions
1. A 2D numerical analysis of MF droplets of different numbers of spikes shows that the
equilibrium shape with two-spikes corresponds to the lowest energy.
2. Along the branch of equilibrium figures with a given number of spikes, a calculation of
energy minimum shows that the spikes are sharpening as magnetic Bond number increases
beyond a definite threshold.
3. The present calculation shows that 2D figures of equilibrium with a "star-fish"
configuration can exist evidently only as transient states. A further confirmation of this point
by a direct numerical simulation of the magnetic fluid droplet hydrodynamics is highly
desirable.
4. Discrepancies between the present results and experimental observations are presumably
connected with the fact that a 2D model is rather incomplete for the understanding the MF
droplet behaviour in high-frequency rotating magnetic fields.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by "Le Reseau Formation Recherche n090R0933 du Ministere de
l'Enseignement Superieur et de la Recherche" of France. Two of us (A.Cebers, S.Lacis) are
thankful to International Science Foundation for financial support of the research in terms of
long-time grant LBGOOO.
75
Chapter 3: included paper
References
1. Bacri lC., Salin D. Instability of ferrofluid magnetic drops under magnetic field
JPhys.Lett.,1982, v.43, N17, pp L649-L654
2. Cebers A., Maiorov M.M. Magnetostatic instabilities in plane layers of magnetic fluid
Magnitnaya.Gidrodinamika (in Russ.), 1980, Nl, pp.27-35
3. Langer S.A., Goldstein R.E., Jackson D.P. Dynamics of labyrinthine pattern formation in
magnetic fluids. Phys.Rev.A, 1992,v.46,N8,pp 4894-4904
4. Bacri J.C., Cebers A.O., Perzynski R. Behavior of a magnetic fluid microdrop III a
rotating magnetic field Phys.Rev.Lett., 1994, v.72, N17, pp 2705-2708
5. Cebers A.O., Lacis S. Magnetic fluid free surface instabilities in high frequency rotating
magnetic fields. Brazilian Journal of Physics, (to appear.)
6. R.E.Rosensweig. Ferrohydrodynarnics. Cambridge University Press, 1985, 344p
7. Hao Li, Hasley T.e., Lobkovsky A., Singular shape of a fluid drop in an electric or
magnetic field. Europhys.Lett., 1994, v.27, N8, pp575-580
8. Bacri J.e., Cebers A., Lacis S., Perzynski R. (to be published)
9. Sherwood lD., Breakup of fluid droplets in electrical and magnetic fields JFluid Mech.,
1988, v.188, pp.133-146
10. Cebers A. Numerical simulation of ferro fluid drop dynamics in static and rotating
magnetic fields Magnitnaya. Gidrodinamika (in Russ), 1986, N4, pp.3-1 0 (Y~cneHHoe
MO,Qen~poBaH~e ,Q~HaM~K~ xanna HaMarH~~~BalO~e~C51 )K~,QKOCT~ B
nOCT051HHOM ~ Bpa~alO~eMC51 MarH~THbIX nonsx)
11. Boudouvis A.G., Puchalla J.L., Scriven L.E. Magnetohydrostatic equilibria of ferrofluid
drops in external magnetic fields. Chern. Eng. Cornm. 1988, v.67, pp.129-144
12. Boudouvis A.G., Scriven L.E. Sensitivity analysis of hysteresis in deformation of
ferrofluid drops. .LMagn.Magn.Mater. 1993, v.122, pp.254-258
13. Zwikker e. The advanced geometry of plane curves and their applications, Dover
Publication, Inc., New Yark, 1963, 299p
76
Chapter 3: included paper
14. Vanderlick T.K., Mohwald H. Mode selection and shape transitions of phospholipid
monolayer domains - J Phys. Chern., 1990, 94,pp.886-890
FIGURE CAPTIONS
FIGURE 1
Contours constructed for different values of spike number and parameters £ and S.
FIGURE 2
The total energy of the 2D droplet E, - Eca versus the magnetic Bond number for s=0.2
(number of spikes n=2, ...,6) and for ellipse, fl=25.
FIGURE 3
The large semi-axis a = adim / R of the ellipse in the rotating magnetic field as a function of
the magnetic Bond number.
FIGURE 4a
The total energy of the ellipse E; - Eca in the rotating magnetic field as a function of the
magnetic Bond number, ).1=25.
FIGURE 4b
The total energy E; curves of the ellipse in the rotating magnetic field versus its large semi-
axis value a = adim / R, fl=25. Bm=23.97 corresponds to the threshold and Bm=20.7 to the
turning point.
FIGURE 5
The total energy E, - Eca as a function of the magnetic Bond number, for a 2-spike
configuration: various curves correspond to the ellipse and to shapes with s=O.l, 0.2, 0.4,
0.8.
77
Chapter 3: included paper
FIGURE 6
The total energy E, - Eco as a function of magnetic Bond number, for a 4-spike
configuration: various curves correspond to the ellipse and to shapes with S=O.l, 0.2, 0.4,
0.8.
FIGURE 7
The total energy E; - Eco as a function of magnetic Bond number. The curves are the paths of
minimal energy for ellipse and for the 2,4,6-spike "star-fish" configurations. Minimization is
done for S=O.l, 0.2, 0.4, 0.8. Arrows show the direction of hysteresis curves.
78
Chapter 3: included paper
E=O,1,2,3,4
e=O,0.5,1,1.5,2
e=O,1,2,3,4
Fig. 1
79
Chapter 3: included paper
o e 2 3 4 5 6
-12 o
·······2
--- 3
- 4 - ellipse
20 40
_.-5
-6
60
Bm
80
e
100
Fig.2
6
3
5
4
2
1
o 20 40
Bm
60 80
Fig.3
80
Chapter 3: included paper
0.2
0.1 Jl=25
0.0
0pJy -0.1
Iy
pJ -0.2
-0.3
-0.420 21 22 23 24 25 26
Bm
Fig.4a
0.6
-0.2
1 2 3 4 5 6a
Fig.4b
81
Chapter 3: included paper
2-spike instability
0 0.8 0.4 0.2 0.1
--_ .. 0.8
o -2 0.4o
~ I 0.2o~
-4 _._ ..- S=O·l
ellipse
-6
0 20 40 60
Bm
Fig.5
4-spike instability
0.8 0.4 0.2 0.10
- -- 0.8
-2 0.40(JOJ 0.2I ---------(J
~ -4 .......... __ ..._-- s=O.l
ellipse
-6
0 20 40 60 80
Bm
Fig.6
82
Chapter 3: included paper
o
o -2
~u
I
~u
-4
-6 o
-.-._.-.-.6
---- 4
------- 2
ellipse
20 40 60
Bm
80 100
Fig.?
83
Chapter 3
Conclusions
1. The results obtained from the energetical approach confirms existence of the magnetic
field threshold in respect to any perturbation from circular shape in 2D in the high-
frequency rotating magnetic field. Along the branch of the equilibrium figures with a
given number of spikes, a calculation of energy minimum shows that the spikes are
sharpening as magnetic Bond number increases beyond a definite threshold thus
causing the concentration of the magnetic field in these spikes, specially if a magnetic
permeability has as high value as ~:=:::25considering the concentrated phase.
2. A 2D numerical analysis of MF droplets with different numbers of spikes shows that
the equilibrium shape with two-spikes corresponds to the lowest energy and thus the
transition from 2-spike shape to the shape with larger amount of spikes does not take
place.
3. The present calculation shows that 2D figures of equilibrium with a "star-fish"
configuration can exist evidently only as transient states. A further confirmation of this
point for number of spikes n>3 is given in Chapter 4 by a direct numerical simulation
of the magnetic fluid droplet hydrodynamics.
4. Discrepancies between the present results and the experimental observations are
presumably connected with the fact that a 2D model is rather incomplete for the
understanding the MF droplet behaviour in high-frequency rotating magnetic fields.
That means that physical mechanisms leading experimentally to the increase of the
number of spikes with the increase of rotating field strength, includes 3D effects or
even the viscous flow around the droplet.
85
Chapter 4
High-frequency rotating magnetic
field: dynamic simulation.
In the previous chapter the equilibrium shapes were analysed from pure
energetical approach. In such a way it is possible for the given magnetic Bond number
to detect which shape from some a priori given set has the energy minimum. The
advantage of this method is that for linear magnetisation it is necessary only once to
calculate geometry and magnetic permeability dependent field variables ax, uy (see
formulae (11),(12) in [7*]), and afterwards only simple calculations (see the formula
(14) in [7*]) are needed to get the magnetic energy of a droplet. Thus by limited
calculations the great variety of shapes could be analysed for the energy minimum for
arbitrary values of Bond number. The drawback of the energy approach is that the
shapes should be given a priory, thus limiting the possible shapes by that ones,
generated in some fashion. Thus it is very hard to study the transitions, where non-
symmetric shapes appear, because these non-symmetric shapes are almost impossible
to predict a priori.
A direct dynamical simulation of the surface forced driven motion of the droplet
in high-frequency rotating magnetic field is presented in this chapter. The dynamical
simulation is in some aspect more computer time consuming method, but the power of
it is stated by the absence of constraints on the shape of the droplet. The essence of the
droplet behaviour is already described in the previous chapter, here the behaviour of
the 2D droplet in the high-frequency rotating magnetic field is studied in more details
using the dynamic simulation as an observation instrument, and, in particular, most of
87
Chapter 4
attention is devoted to the transitional motion of a droplet. Transitions of a 2D droplet
in the high-frequency rotating magnetic field could be classified as:
• transitions just beyond the magnetic Bond nwnber threshold;
• transitions from the perturbed shape back to the circular one;
• transitions between shapes with different nwnbers of spikes.
4.1. Theoretical predictions
Transitions which appear at the magnetic Bond nwnber threshold, where the
shape of a 2D droplet is near to the circular one, could be studied using the small
perturbation theory. The simplest case, the linear small perturbation theory, gives
predictions about the critical magnetic Bond nwnber and about the rate of the growth
of perturbations.
In [35] the infmite cylindrical volwne of magnetic fluid (2D droplet) is considered
under the action of the rotating in a plane normal to its axis magnetic field. It is
assumed the characteristical time of the droplet shape relaxation is much larger than
the period of the rotating field and time averaging with respect to rotating field is
possible. Under these asswnptions the stability of the droplet's shape is considered
with respect to n-lobe perturbation given in polar coordinates (r,~) by
r( ~) = R + all cos(n~), ( 4. 1 )
where R is the radius of unperturbed 2D droplet. The differential equation for
perturbation an development is obtained on the basis of the Cauchy-Lagrange integral
[35,25], taking into account kinematic condition and the time averaged magnetic field
strength, which is calculated in linear approximation of small perturbation theory:
di a; cr {< Bm (~-IYJ--+-·n(n-l n+l)---- a =0.dt' pR3 211: ~+IY n
The solution (4.2) defines an exponential dependence on time for perturbation
(4.2)
a =a nexp( co t), thus providing the dimensional growth increment of the surface
perturbation co:
2 c , {Bm ~ -IY ~co = -3 . n\n -1 - 3- (n + 1) .
pR 2n (~+l) (4.3)
88
Chapter 4
From this expression the threshold value of magnetic Bond number with respect to n-
lobe perturbation is found:
Bm(n) =2rr/n+I)~+IY. (4.4)
cr \ ~ -lY
This value in the case of n=2 is in very good agreement with numerical simulation
(see Chapter 2). According to (4), the perturbation with n lobes may appear only if
magnetic Bond number exceeds the corresponding threshold value Bm~;). According
to Fig.4.1(a), the dependence of the threshold value on the magnetic permeability is
not particularly pronounced for ~>20. Quite different is the situation in the case of
small values of a magnetic permeability (u« l 0), decrease of the magnetic
permeability, what physically can be caused by the dilution of the ferrofluid, leads to
the drastic increase of the critical value of the magnetic Bond number (Fig.4.1 (b)).
More information about perturbation evolution could be obtained analysing the
expression (4.3) with respect to "the most unstable mode", which has the greatest
growth rate at given magnetic Bond number Bm. This "most unstable mode" is given
b I· f h . a0)2y so ution 0 t e equauon -- = 0 :an
(2n-l)Bm'-~n2 -1)=0, (4.5)
Bm' = Bm ~ -1): = H~R ~ -1): ' (4.6)
2n (~+1) 2ncr (~+1)
adding the condition that 0)2>0 for the found value of n at given Bm. The largest root
of the equation (4.5)
Bm + ~ Bm .2 - 3 Bm + 3n. = ---------- 3
satisfies that condition for all n,>1. The fairly good approximation of is given by
(4.7)
2Bm·n, ~-- (4.8)3 2'
according to Fig.4.2, the absolute difference even at n.=2 is only 0.06 (3%) .
•According to (4.3) if Bm value is beyond the magnetic field threshold for mode n=2
• •(Bm >3), then the set of competing modes from n=2 to n=Bm -1 co-exists, but the
highest grows rate has mode n•. It is illustrated in Fig.4.3 where a square of a
89
Chapter 4
modified perturbation decrement (j)2pR3/cr is plotted versus n at fixed value of
•modified Bond number Bm =16. Unstable modes are for 2Sn<14, but the highest
grows rate has mode n=10 (from formula (4.8) n.=10.17).
4.2. n-Iobe perturbation decrements in the case
of creeping flow
In order to derive perturbation decrement in the case of a viscous 2D ferrofluid
droplet placed in a surrounding non-magnetic viscous fluid in a presence of high-
frequency rotating magnetic field, the problem of the creeping flow is solved at given
perturbation rate ~r = L cos(n~) on the surface of the circular boundary at the
restriction that ~. The value n= I corresponds to the pure translation motion
vx=const (check (4.14)-(4.17)), there is no change of nether magnetic nor surface
energies, the rate of energy dissipation is zero. Solution of biharmonic equation
t1(t1<1» = 0, (4.9)
where t1 is Laplace operator and <1>is a stream function, is used to calculate velocity
components in polar coordinates (r,~):
18<1> 8<1>
v r = -; 8~' v xx,o = - sin ~ cos ~ ~a2 - cos/ ~~a2 + b2)+ cos" ~(2a2 - 2b2))1 ~ ,
<1>'\,,0 = -2~3(2a + b)- cos ~3a(a + b)(2a2 + ab + b2)+
cos' ~ 6a2 (a + by - cos" ~ 2(a + by (a - b)Y (~(a + bY)
149
Chapter 5: included papers
here
hi; = a' - (a2 - b2)coS2 ~,
subscript 0 denotes function value on the surface (~=O).
Velocity of external flow, given by (13), on the surface of a droplet is equal to
velocity of a flow inside the droplet
v .r = Yxxa cos ~ + Yxyb sin ~
v y = Yyxa cos ~ + Yyyb sin ~
In order to express values of characteristic coefficients of external flow (13) by
velocity gradients Yij inside the droplet both sides of the equation vin = vex from
boundary conditions (5) are multiplied by hi; and the obtained equation is treated like
Fourier series. This procedure gives the following values:
(a + bY(a2 +b2) yyS=------4 '
_ a(hy xy + (2a + b)y.n)A21 - --------- 8
(a+bYy Vl'An = ...-- 8
follows that Yxr = -Y yy' Viscous stresses (3)
(15)
ab(a+b){, )
T = 4 \J xy + Y yx
(a + byy yy
All =- 8 '
A = _ b((a + 2b)y.