Vēdera priekšējās sienas elektīvu trūču slēgšana ar polipropilēna protēzi
Loading...
Date
Authors
Advisor
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Latvijas Universitāte
Language
N/A
Abstract
VĒDERA PRIEKŠĒJĀS SIENAS TRŪČU SLĒGŠANA AR POLIPROPILĒNA
PROTĒZI, TĀS IZVĒRTĒJUMS
DARBA MĒRĶIS. Analizēt iznākumus pēc vēdera priekšējās sienas elektīvu trūču
slēgšanas ar polipropilēna protēzi virsmuskuļu pozīcijā no organisma agrīnas sistēmiskas
iekaisuma reakcijas analīzes un klīnisko rezultātu monitorēšanas skatpunktiem.
PACIENTI UN METODES. Prospektīvā pētījumā iekļauti pacienti, kuriem plānveidā
operētas vēdera priekšējās sienas trūces ar polipropilēna protēzēm virsmuskuļu pozīcijā.
Tika izvirzīti sekojoši uzdevumi: 1) noteikt vēdera priekšējās sienas trūču incidenci
operētajiem pacientiem, sniegt pacientu demogrāfisko raksturojumu, analizēt veikto operāciju
tehniskos datus, 2) izvērtēt komplikāciju veidus, biežumu, savstarpējo ietekmi un iznākumus,
3) analizēt komplikāciju cēloņus, riska faktorus un profilakses iespējas, 4) noskaidrot
simultāni veikto operāciju iznākumus, 5) Izvērtēt agrīnas sistēmiskas organisma iekaisuma
reakcijas izteiktību, to ietekmējošos faktorus un tās ietekmi uz klīniskiem rezultātiem, 6 )
analizēt izmantoto operācijas metožu un protēžu iespējamās problēmas.
REZULTĀTI. Pētījumā tika iekļauti 504 pacienti ar 607 trūcēm un 579 implantētām
protēzēm. No trūcēm 381 bija ingvinālas, 102 postoperatīvas 84 umbilikālas, 26 epigastrālas
un 14 femorālas.
Protēzes izraisītu komplikāciju biežums bija relatīvi neliels un, atkarībā no trūces grupas,
iekļāvās diapazonā no 0,5 līdz 5 %.
Protēzes svars neietekmēja hronisku sāpju, seromu vai protēzes infekcijas biežumu.
Starp mono un polifilamentajām protēzēm netika konstatētas būtiskas atšķirības no
komplikāciju un agrīnas sistēmiskas iekaisuma reakcijas analīzes skatpunktiem.
Agrīna sistēmiska organisma iekaisuma reakcija bija atkarīga no audu traumas plašuma un
nevis protēzes svara.
Tika konstatēta pacientu individuāla sistēmiska iekaisuma reakcija uz audu traumu, kur
pacientiem ar augstu reakciju pastāv īslaicīgs imūnās sistēmas nomākums, lai gan klīniski
netika konstatētas ticamas atšķirības starp dažādas sistēmiskas iekaisuma reakcijas grupām.
Simultāni veikto operāciju rezultāti būtiski neatšķirās no pacientu rezultātiem, kuriem tika
veikta 1 operācija.
Polipropilēna protēzes ievietošana virsmuskuļu pozīcijā neizraisa intraabdominālu
saaugumu veidošanos un nepieciešamības gadījumā neapgrūtina, atkārtotas laparotomijas
veikšanu.
Izmantojot protēzes virsmuskuļu lokalizācijas operāciju metodes var būt grūtības adekvāti
izvērtēt blakustrūču esamību.
SECINĀJUMI. Polipropilēna protēzes ir efektīvas un drošas, tāpēc tās var rekomendēt
jebkuru elektīvu vēdera priekšējās sienas trūču slēgšanai virsmuskuļu pozīcijā pieaugušajiem,
neatkarīgi no pacientu vecuma un dzimuma.
Jebkādas ģenēzes agrīna organisma sistēmiska iekaisuma reakcija neiespaido polipropilēna
protēzes integrāciju un neietekmē vēlīnos klīniskos rezultātus.
Simultāna vairāku polipropilēna protēžu ievietošana virsmuskuļu pozicijā, tīru vai
potenciāli kontaminētu elektīvu operāciju gadījumā neietekmē klīniskos iznākumus no
infekciozo un vispārējo komplikāciju aspekta.
HERNIA REPAIR OF ANTERIOR ABDOMINAL WALL WITH POLYPROPYLENE PROSTHESIS, ITS EVALUATION AIM OF THE WORK. To analyse outcomes after anterior abdominal wall elective hernia repair with polypropylene prosthesis in onlay position from viewpoints of early body systemic inflammatory reaction analysis and monitoring of clinical results. PATIENTS AND METHODS. Patients to whom elective surgery of anterior abdominal wall hernia with polypropylene prosthesis in onlay position has been performed were enrolled in the prospective study. The following tasks were advanced: 1) to establish incidence of anterior abdominal wall hernia in operated patients, to give demographic characteristics of patients, to analyse technical data of performed surgeries, 2) to assess types, frequency, mutual effects and outcomes of complications, 3) to analyse causes, risk factors and prevention possibilities of complications, 4) to find out outcomes of simultaneous surgeries, 5) to evaluate severity of early systemic body inflammatory reaction, factors affecting it and its effect on clinical results, 6) to analyse possible problems of used surgery methods and prosthesis. RESULTS. 504 patients with 607 hernias and 579 implanted prostheses were included in the study. 381 of hernias were inguinal, 102 incisional, 84 umbilical, 26 epigastric and 14 femoral. The frequency of complications caused by prosthesis was relatively small and depending on the hernia group it was in the range of 0.5 to 5%. The prosthesis weight did not influence frequency of chronic pain, seroma or prosthetic infections. There were no significant differences between mono- and polifilament prosthesis concerning complications and early systemic inflammation reaction analysis. The early systemic body inflammatory reaction was dependent on the extent of tissue trauma, not on the prosthesis weight. Individual systemic inflammatory reaction of patients to tissue trauma were established, where patients with high reaction have temporarily immunosupression, although clinically there were no significant differences between groups of different systemic inflammatory reaction. Results of simultaneous surgeries did not differ significantly from results in patients to whom 1 surgery was performed. Insertion of polypropylene prosthesis in onlay position does not cause formation of intraabdominal adhesions and in case of necessity does not obstacle performance of repeated laparatomy. Using surgery methods of onlay localization prosthesis there may be difficulties to asses existence of concomitant hernias. CONCLUSIONS. Polypropylene prostheses are effective and safe, therefore they may be recommended for closure of any elective abdominal wall hernias in onlay position for adults, irrespective of their age and gender. Early body systemic inflammatory reaction does not affect integration of polypropylene prosthesis and late clinical results. Simultaneous insertion of several polypropylene prostheses in onlay position in case of clean or potentially contamined elective surgeries does not affect clinical outcomes from aspect of infectious and general complications.
HERNIA REPAIR OF ANTERIOR ABDOMINAL WALL WITH POLYPROPYLENE PROSTHESIS, ITS EVALUATION AIM OF THE WORK. To analyse outcomes after anterior abdominal wall elective hernia repair with polypropylene prosthesis in onlay position from viewpoints of early body systemic inflammatory reaction analysis and monitoring of clinical results. PATIENTS AND METHODS. Patients to whom elective surgery of anterior abdominal wall hernia with polypropylene prosthesis in onlay position has been performed were enrolled in the prospective study. The following tasks were advanced: 1) to establish incidence of anterior abdominal wall hernia in operated patients, to give demographic characteristics of patients, to analyse technical data of performed surgeries, 2) to assess types, frequency, mutual effects and outcomes of complications, 3) to analyse causes, risk factors and prevention possibilities of complications, 4) to find out outcomes of simultaneous surgeries, 5) to evaluate severity of early systemic body inflammatory reaction, factors affecting it and its effect on clinical results, 6) to analyse possible problems of used surgery methods and prosthesis. RESULTS. 504 patients with 607 hernias and 579 implanted prostheses were included in the study. 381 of hernias were inguinal, 102 incisional, 84 umbilical, 26 epigastric and 14 femoral. The frequency of complications caused by prosthesis was relatively small and depending on the hernia group it was in the range of 0.5 to 5%. The prosthesis weight did not influence frequency of chronic pain, seroma or prosthetic infections. There were no significant differences between mono- and polifilament prosthesis concerning complications and early systemic inflammation reaction analysis. The early systemic body inflammatory reaction was dependent on the extent of tissue trauma, not on the prosthesis weight. Individual systemic inflammatory reaction of patients to tissue trauma were established, where patients with high reaction have temporarily immunosupression, although clinically there were no significant differences between groups of different systemic inflammatory reaction. Results of simultaneous surgeries did not differ significantly from results in patients to whom 1 surgery was performed. Insertion of polypropylene prosthesis in onlay position does not cause formation of intraabdominal adhesions and in case of necessity does not obstacle performance of repeated laparatomy. Using surgery methods of onlay localization prosthesis there may be difficulties to asses existence of concomitant hernias. CONCLUSIONS. Polypropylene prostheses are effective and safe, therefore they may be recommended for closure of any elective abdominal wall hernias in onlay position for adults, irrespective of their age and gender. Early body systemic inflammatory reaction does not affect integration of polypropylene prosthesis and late clinical results. Simultaneous insertion of several polypropylene prostheses in onlay position in case of clean or potentially contamined elective surgeries does not affect clinical outcomes from aspect of infectious and general complications.