Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorJerņeva, Jūlija
dc.contributor.authorĀdamsons, Lauris
dc.contributor.otherRiga Graduate School of Law
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-21T08:50:58Z
dc.date.available2019-02-21T08:50:58Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.lu.lv/dspace/handle/7/46391
dc.description.abstractThe thesis discusses the European Union decisional practice towards rebates that are granted by dominant undertakings and are conditional upon its customers obtaining all or almost all of their requirements from those dominant undertakings, known as exclusivity rebates. The thesis seeks to find any possible objective justifications that dominant undertaking can put forward to justify its exclusivity rebate conduct which is considered abusive by its very nature under Article 102 TFEU. The main focus of the thesis is Hoffmann-La Roche decisions which set standards that are applied by the Courts of the Union in exclusivity rebates cases since the latest decision in Intel case.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherRiga Graduate School of Lawen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccessen_US
dc.subjectResearch Subject Categories::LAW/JURISPRUDENCE::Other law::European lawen_US
dc.subjectResearch Subject Categories::LAW/JURISPRUDENCE::Private law::Contract lawen_US
dc.titleAssessment of exclusivity rebates under the Article 102 TFEUen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesisen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record