Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorButāne, Ilona
dc.contributor.authorŠveha, Juta
dc.contributor.otherRiga Graduate School of Law
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-22T12:38:43Z
dc.date.available2020-01-22T12:38:43Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.lu.lv/dspace/handle/7/49595
dc.description.abstractThe main objective of the paper is to analyse the temporal effect of the interpretation of Article 132(1)(f) of the VAT Directive given by CJEU in Latvian case C-326/15 DNB Banka and Polish case C-605/15 Aviva with regard more specifically to Latvian financial and insurance services sector. In doing so, the author aims to determine at which moment Latvian financial institutions and insurance companies are legally obliged to cease the application of the cost-sharing exemption to services provided within the cost-sharing group pursuant to CJEU’s judgments in C-326/15 DNB Banka and C-605/15 Aviva cases.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherRiga Graduate School of Lawen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccessen_US
dc.subjectResearch Subject Categories::LAW/JURISPRUDENCE::Other law::European lawen_US
dc.subjectInsuranceen_US
dc.subjectLatviaen_US
dc.titleTemporal effect of interpretation in CJEU judgments in C-326/15 DNB Banka and C-605/15 Aviva: implications on cost-sharing in Latvian financial and insurance services sectorsen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record