Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorRatniece, Laura
dc.contributor.authorGumeņuks, Andrejs
dc.contributor.otherRiga Graduate School of Lawen
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-15T07:41:20Z
dc.date.available2020-10-15T07:41:20Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.lu.lv/dspace/handle/7/52737
dc.description.abstractThe paper is focused on two issues: the constitutionality of the death penalty and inconsistency of justices of the Supreme Court of the United States. The paper aims at finding out how the constitutionality of the death penalty was challenged and whether or not were justices of the Supreme Court inconsistent in their opinions. In order to answer the research question, the author analyzes the cases of the Supreme Court of the United States. The cases touch upon issues of the death penalty for rape, kidnapping, juveniles, mentally ill persons. The landmark cases, which stopped and then renewed the executions, will be analyzed.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherRiga Graduate School of Lawen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccessen_US
dc.subjectHuman rightsen_US
dc.subjectUnited States of Americaen_US
dc.subjectSupreme Courten_US
dc.subjectDeath penaltyen_US
dc.titleThe death penalty in the United States of America: challenging the constitutionality and analyzing inconsistency of the Supreme Court justicesen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesisen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record