Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorHiršs, Mārtiņš
dc.contributor.authorBēta, Sindija
dc.contributor.otherRiga Graduate School of Lawen
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-15T07:51:21Z
dc.date.available2020-10-15T07:51:21Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.lu.lv/dspace/handle/7/52742
dc.description.abstractThe paper examines Article 39 of the UN Charter and how the main principle of the Security Council “to maintain or restore international peace and security” is interpreted by Russia and is it consistent with the understanding established by the international community and UN itself. To understand the Russian approach towards the principle, Georgian conflict of 2008 is chosen to analyze how Russia implemented this principle in a crisis scenario and can the particular use of force case fall under Article 39 norms. Paper aims to show the differences between Article 39 cases in Kosovo and Libya and Russian intervention in Georgia to emphasize how Russian understanding of Article 39 is based on national interests and limits their neighbouring states’ rights under UN Charter. It is argued here that Russia has illegally defined its zones of interest, whilst limiting the operational capacities of the UN Security Council.  en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherRiga Graduate School of Lawen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccessen_US
dc.subjectResearch Subject Categories::LAW/JURISPRUDENCE::Other law::International lawen_US
dc.subjectRussian Federationen_US
dc.subjectUnited Nations Security Councilen_US
dc.titleMaintenance of international peace and security: analysis of Russian use of force abroad and Article 39 of UN Charter implementation in Georgia in 2008en_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesisen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record