Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorRatniece, LauraEN
dc.contributor.authorStirniņa, Sabīne
dc.contributor.otherRiga Graduate School of LawEN
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-15T10:42:21Z
dc.date.available2022-07-15T10:42:21Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.lu.lv/dspace/handle/7/61017
dc.description.abstractThe United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods offers the promise of harmonising international sales law. In this regard, Article 8 of the CISG establishes uniform rules for the interpretation of statements and conduct of parties to an international sales contract. However, considering that the Convention is the result of decades of negotiations among countries from different legal traditions, Article 8 may include legal concepts that are familiar to either common or civil law countries. As a result, courts may undermine the purpose of the CISG and interpret the principles in light of domestic law, leading to the non-uniform application of the Convention. This thesis, through doctrinal legal analysis, seeks to determine whether Article 8 contains elements closer to common or civil law legal traditions and ascertains whether courts have interpreted the Article by recourse to domestic rules of interpretation.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherRiga Graduate School of Lawen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccessen_US
dc.subjectResearch Subject Categories::LAW/JURISPRUDENCE::Other law::International private law and international procedural lawen_US
dc.subjectThe United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goodsen_US
dc.subjectLegal traditionsen_US
dc.titleThe interpretation regime under Article 8 of the CISG and the dichotomy between common and civil lawen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesisen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record