Zur Kurzanzeige

dc.contributor.advisorSvoks, Rainers
dc.contributor.authorTurka, Karmena
dc.contributor.otherRiga Graduate School of Law
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-01T12:37:20Z
dc.date.available2025-08-01T12:37:20Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.lu.lv/dspace/handle/7/71654
dc.description.abstractBy applying the 2020 Norilsk oil spill as a case study, this thesis investigates how effectively international legal frameworks safeguard indigenous rights in the Arctic. The research finds accountability gaps in protecting indigenous communities from environmental harm brought on by industrial activities by examining the applicability of the ARSIWA, the UNCLOS, and the ECHR. Thesis demonstrates that although these frameworks establish the foundation for state accountability, they are insufficient to address how environmental degradation, corporate responsibility, and indigenous rights intersect. In addition, the Handölsdalen Sami Villages v. Sweden case serves as a comparative analysis that highlights the procedural obstacles that indigenous communities encounter when trying to obtain legal remedies by comparing indigenous communities in Norilsk and in Sami Villages.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherRiga Graduate School of Lawen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccessen_US
dc.subjectResearch Subject Categories::LAW/JURISPRUDENCE::Other law::Environmental lawen_US
dc.subjectResearch Subject Categories::LAW/JURISPRUDENCE::Other law::International lawen_US
dc.subjectArctic governanceen_US
dc.subjectIndigenous rightsen_US
dc.subjectUNCLOSen_US
dc.subjectNorilsk oil spillen_US
dc.titleRussian Arctic oil exploration and its impact on indigenous communities: the case of the Norilsk oil spillen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesisen_US


Dateien zu dieser Ressource

Thumbnail

Das Dokument erscheint in:

Zur Kurzanzeige