Legal and diplomatic challenges in the implementation of the two-state resolution

Abstract

This thesis explores the legal and diplomatic challenges to implementing the two-state solution in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Despite broad international support, the solution remains unfulfilled due to legal ambiguities, weak enforcement mechanisms, and fragmented diplomacy. The study analyzes key legal instruments, territorial disputes, settlement policies, and refugee rights as well as the role of international and regional actors. It argues that political asymmetry and selective application of international law have undermined meaningful progress. Diplomatic failures, shifting alliances and lack of enforcement have further stalled negotiations. The research concludes that while the two-state solution remains a central legal and diplomatic framework, it is unlikely to succeed without major changes in international accountability and mediation. Limitations include restricted access to certain primary sources and the evolving nature of the conflict.