Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPodnieks, Karlis
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-04T10:16:38Z
dc.date.available2018-02-04T10:16:38Z
dc.date.issued2010-11-24
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.lu.lv/dspace/handle/7/38264
dc.description.abstractWhat is a model? Surprisingly, in philosophical texts, this question is asked (sometimes), but almost never – answered. Instead of a general answer, usually, some classification of models is considered. The broadest possible definition of modeling could sound as follows: a model is anything that is (or could be) used, for some purpose, in place of something else. If the purpose is “answering questions”, then one has a cognitive model. Could such a broad definition be useful? Isn't it empty? Can one derive useful consequences from it? I'm trying to show that there is a lot of them.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectResearch Subject Categories::HUMANITIES and RELIGIONen_US
dc.subjectmodelsen_US
dc.subjectmodelingen_US
dc.subjectmodel templateen_US
dc.subjectDappled Worlden_US
dc.titleTowards a General Definition of Modelingen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/preprinten_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record